爆料网

Article 2.1(e)

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 31 - 38 of 38
    2019-爆料网AT-974, Salah

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify grounds for his appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s case was fully and fairly considered. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly based its conclusion about the legality of the termination decision on the medical assessment by the medical board and without medical findings of its own. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate the Appellant’s appointment on medical grounds was a reasonable and valid exercise of 爆料网RWA’s discretion. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the burden of proof of demonstrating an error in the impugned judgment such as...

    2019-爆料网AT-960, Abdeljalil

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s case was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT found no error of law in 爆料网RWA DT’s decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT properly reviewed the contested decision in accordance with the applicable law. 爆料网AT held that the non-extension of the limited duration contract was a result of the elimination of her post due to a lack of funds, which constituted a valid reason proffered by the Administration for not renewing her appointment. 爆料网AT held that, by applying objective criteria in the reduction of the staffing levels, 爆料网RWA adhered to the principles of equality...

    2019-爆料网AT-950, Diop

    爆料网AT held that the case was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT found no error of law or fact in the 爆料网DT decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT thoroughly considered the material facts of the case at issue and found that the qualification the Appellant had attained was not the equivalent of the required first-level university degree. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT conclusions were consistent with the evidence and that the Appellant did not put forward any persuasive grounds to warrant interference by 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT...

    2019-爆料网AT-932, Kinyanjui

    爆料网AT held that the Administration was not under an obligation to pursue a recruitment procedure once begun by filling the post. 爆料网AT held that the contested administrative decision not to carry the recruitment process through to appointment, but rather to readvertise, was a valid and lawful exercise of the Administration’s discretion, based on sound reasons inextricably linked to the interest of the service, namely the situation in Burundi, the need for additional skills, and compliance with the relevant legal instruments governing the recruitment procedure. 爆料网AT held that the contested...

    2019-爆料网AT-915, Yasin

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly reviewed the contested decision in accordance with the applicable law and established the critical facts of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had a broad discretion to determine the admissibility of evidence and the weight to be attached thereto and that 爆料网DT’s conclusion was consistent with the evidence. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the impugned decision was unlawful was correct, albeit for different reasoning. 爆料网AT held that the facts underpinning the administrative decision to issue the staff member a...

    2020-爆料网AT-1024, Nyawa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Nyawa committed the disciplinary offenses attributed to him. 爆料网AT held that the established facts amounted to misconduct on the part of Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT disagreed with 爆料网DT that a written censure was subsumed by the sanction of deferment for eligibility for promotion, however, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s holding that the deferment for eligibility for promotion was sufficient sanction was not a manifestly unreasonable decision warranting 爆料网AT intervention...

    2020-爆料网AT-985, Mohamed

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that the 爆料网DT judgment was defective or that the 爆料网DT erred in considering that the selected candidate met the minimum educational requirements and the work experience required for the job. Emphasizing the broad discretion of the Secretary-General and that it was not the role of 爆料网DT to substitute its own decision for that of the Secretary-General, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was not manifestly unreasonable in deciding that the recommendation approved by the Secretary-General was based on an entire process and the experience of the candidates. 爆料网AT held...

    2021-爆料网AT-1136, Abdulhamid Al Fararjeh

    爆料网AT held that the facts upon which 爆料网RWA based its decision were established, in full respect of his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err as there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant committed sexual exploitation and abuse against a beneficiary of 爆料网RWA; neither did it err in concluding that the disciplinary sanction was proportionate and lawful. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant, by having the complainant remove her pants and underwear and engaging in a such a sensitive and specific medical examination, which he did not have the required competencies and...