2025-爆料网AT-1591, Priscilla Ngigi
L'爆料网AT a estimé que l'爆料网DT avait correctement appliqué les critères de contr?le juridictionnel prévus à l'article 2(1)(b) de son statut. Il a estimé que les faits constitutifs de la faute avaient été établis par des preuves claires et convaincantes, notamment des témoignages directs de réfugiés, des preuves documentaires corroborantes et des ou?-dire, et que l'ancien membre du personnel avait sollicité à plusieurs reprises entre 2010 et 2019 des pots-de-vin auprès de réfugiés en échange d'une aide à la réinstallation et d'autres services du HCR. Il a estimé que les faits établis constituaient...
2025-爆料网AT-1593, Sheldon Heron Carter
L'爆料网AT a estimé que la décision de maintenir la note de performance ? C – Répond partiellement aux attentes ? attribuée au fonctionnaire constituait une décision administrative susceptible de recours ayant un effet juridique direct sur son emploi. Elle a fait remarquer que, dans le cadre juridique applicable, une note ? Répond partiellement aux attentes ? justifie la décision de ne pas accorder d'augmentation salariale et que celle-ci doit être suspendue dans l'attente des résultats d'un PIP. Le T爆料网AT a considéré que ces conséquences constituaient des effets défavorables résultant directement...
2025-爆料网AT-1594, Ismail Mahmoud Awadat
L'爆料网AT a estimé que le Tribunal du contentieux de l'爆料网RWA n'avait pas commis d'erreur en concluant que la faute de l'ancien membre du personnel était établie et que la mesure disciplinaire de licenciement, assortie d'une indemnité tenant lieu de préavis et sans indemnité de licenciement, était proportionnée au regard du cadre réglementaire de l'Agence. Le T爆料网U a souligné que la fraude et les pratiques collusoires sont considérées comme des domaines très préoccupants et que la faute commise par une personne occupant un poste de confiance, tel qu'un membre du Comité des prêts du Fonds de...
2025-爆料网AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas
L'爆料网AT a noté que plusieurs mois après le décès du participant au Fonds, l'appelant avait produit des formulaires Pens.A/2 visant à modifier la désignation du bénéficiaire du règlement résiduel, signés d'une empreinte digitale et non de la signature du participant. L'爆料网AT a également pris note des preuves médicales attestant des signes de démence du participant.
L'爆料网AT a conclu que l'appelant n'avait fourni aucune preuve à l'appui de l'affirmation selon laquelle les capacités mentales du participant s'étaient améliorées au moment où il avait apposé son empreinte digitale sur les formulaires...
2025-爆料网AT-1588, Dorah Likukela
L'爆料网AT a déterminé qu'il avait été démontré par des preuves claires et convaincantes que l'ancienne employée avait commis une faute grave en : i) ne restituant pas à la coopérative de crédit fédérale des Nations Unies (爆料网FCU) des fonds d'un montant de 587 428,65 dollars américains qui avaient été crédités par erreur sur son compte et auxquels elle n'avait pas droit ; ii) n'ayant pas respecté un jugement rendu par la Haute Cour de Zambie (jugement de la Haute Cour), qui lui ordonnait de restituer les fonds susmentionnés à l'爆料网FCU ; et iii) ayant présenté de faux documents et/ou déformé les...
2025-爆料网AT-1587, Neha Mehta
L'爆料网AT a estimé que l'爆料网DT avait commis une erreur en concluant que les performances de l'ancienne fonctionnaire n'avaient pas été évaluées de manière équitable et objective. Il a constaté qu'elle savait que son accord de télétravail était temporaire et qu'elle s'était néanmoins présentée à son lieu d'affectation aux Fidji quelques mois plus tard seulement. Il a souligné que son retard dans la demande de paiement d'une indemnité forfaitaire de voyage et dans la demande de visa pour sa mère ne justifiait pas son absence de présentation en temps voulu. Le T爆料网AT a confirmé que, pour évaluer...
2025-爆料网AT-1610, Ashok Kumar Nigam
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that the contested decision by the OAI to close the staff member’s complaint was lawful. The 爆料网AT found that the Administration acted reasonably in determining that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation and that the assessment process complied with 爆料网DP’s legal framework.
The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网DT correctly rejected the staff member’s procedural arguments, including claims of bias and denial of witness testimony. The 爆料网AT emphasized that the proposed witnesses could not have altered the established...
2025-爆料网AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas
The 爆料网AT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant’s signature. The 爆料网AT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant’s dementia.
The 爆料网AT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant’s mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The 爆料网AT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...
2024-爆料网AT-1503-Corr.1, Amjad Issa
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT had appropriately concluded that Mr. Issa failed to submit a timely Request for Decision Review regarding the first of three months’ non-payment of his salary. However, the 爆料网AT held that, since each non-payment constitutes a separate administrative decision, Mr. Issa's Request for Decision Review regarding the second- and third-months’ non-payment was timely, rendering his application partially receivable.
The 爆料网AT further concluded however, that since Mr. Issa disregarded a directive circulated before his annual leave (when he was able to check his e-mail)...
2024-爆料网AT-1495, ABA
The 爆料网AT considered whether the interlocutory appeal was receivable because ABA had not been given an opportunity to be heard on the issue of the protective measures for V01 at the proposed hearing at the time the 爆料网DT issued the first Order. The 爆料网AT held that this was not grounds to grant the interlocutory appeal, because ABA’s arguments were heard by the 爆料网DT when he filed his motion for reconsideration.
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction when it issued these case management orders. The 爆料网AT was also not persuaded by ABA’s argument that the violation...
2024-爆料网AT-1494-Corr.1, Zafarkhon Sheralov
The 爆料网AT first considered the staff member’s request for an oral hearing, and decided it was not necessary for the expeditious and fair disposal of his case.
The 爆料网AT observed that when the only persons present in a physical assault are the perpetrator and the victim, an oral hearing may be useful for reaching credibility findings. However, in this case, the 爆料网AT noted that the staff member and his counsel agreed that they had no witnesses to present at an oral hearing and preferred to rely on the investigation report. In these circumstances, the 爆料网DT did not err in not holding an oral hearing...
2024-爆料网AT-1451, Cevat Ozturk
The 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision concerning reimbursements to the staff member took effect in law on 7 May 2019, when he received the wire transfer from the Organization. The reasons for this reimbursement amount were discussed with him shortly before the wire transfer was made. Although explanations of the underlying calculations were repeated in subsequent email exchanges with the staff member, those repetitions were not additional or new administrative decisions that were open to challenge by the staff member, thereby resetting the statute of limitations.
The 爆料网AT found that...
2025-爆料网AT-1572, Nader Slayyeh
L'爆料网AT a estimé que M. Slayyeh n'avait pas formé de recours en bonne et due forme contre le jugement contesté, mais qu'il avait plut?t introduit une nouvelle demande d'indemnisation qui n'avait pas été soumise au Tribunal du contentieux. L'爆料网AT a jugé qu'il ne pouvait pas soulever en appel une question qui n'avait pas été présentée au tribunal de première instance, car cela constituait une violation des droits de l'autre partie à une procédure régulière et n'était pas conforme au système à deux niveaux d'administration de la justice.
Le T爆料网U a estimé que les recours disponibles en vertu de l...
2025-爆料网AT-1568, Giuseppe Fusco
Le T爆料网AT a estimé que l'爆料网ICEF avait mené le processus de sélection dans le respect total de son cadre juridique administratif, notamment en fournissant des motifs détaillés pour justifier le rejet de la candidature du fonctionnaire. Le T爆料网AT a estimé que sa candidature avait fait l'objet d'un examen complet et équitable et qu'il n'avait pas démontré, à l'aide d'éléments de preuve clairs et convaincants, qu'il avait été privé d'une chance équitable d'être sélectionné. Le T爆料网AT a noté qu'il n'y avait aucune preuve de partialité ou de mauvaise intention à son égard.
Le T爆料网AT a estimé que le fait...
2025-爆料网AT-1609, Anne Christin Raschdorf
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable because most of the contested decisions were either time-barred, res judicata, or did not constitute appealable administrative decisions. The 爆料网AT found that the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims (ABCC) correctly determined that the claim for compensation under Appendix D remained time-barred under Article 2.1(b) and that the requirements for waiver under Article 2.1(e) were not met, as there was no evidence of incapacity preventing timely filing. The 爆料网AT further held that...
2025-爆料网AT-1605, Joseph Brown
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the staff member’s actions did not constitute misconduct. The 爆料网AT found that it had been established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the staff member had failed to cooperate with an investigation conducted by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which concerned another staff member under investigation for misrepresenting his place of accommodation.
It found that the staff member had deliberately withheld information and provided generic, vague, and misleading responses during his initial OIOS interview regarding the...
2025-爆料网AT-1608, Patel Noble
The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s application was not receivable, as his placement on the overtime Priority Two List, rather than the Priority One List, and the consequent non-assignment of overtime to him on 10 April 2023, did not violate any regulations, rules or administrative issuances. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member had no contractual right, nor “de facto entitlement” to perform overtime work or to select his own overtime schedule. On the contrary, it recalled that the allocation of overtime is discretionary with management. Furthermore, the 爆料网AT observed that the...
2025-爆料网AT-1594, Ismail Mahmoud Awadat
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s misconduct was established and that the disciplinary measure of separation from service, with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity, was proportionate under the Agency’s regulatory framework. The 爆料网AT emphasized that fraud and collusive practices are considered areas of high concern and that misconduct committed by a person in a position of trust, such as a member of the Provident Fund Loans Committee, warrants a severe sanction.
The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网RWA...
2025-爆料网AT-1591, Priscilla Ngigi
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly applied the judicial review tests under Article 2(1)(b) of its Statute. It found that the facts of misconduct were established by clear and convincing evidence, including direct testimony from refugees, corroborating documentary evidence, and hearsay, and that the former staff member had solicited bribes from refugees on multiple occasions between 2010 and 2019 in exchange for assistance with resettlement and other 爆料网HCR services. It held that the established facts legally amounted to serious misconduct and that the sanction of dismissal was proportionate...
2025-爆料网AT-1588, Dorah Likukela
The 爆料网AT determined that it had been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the former staff member committed serious misconduct by: i) failing to return to the United Nations Federal Credit Union (爆料网FCU) funds of USD 587,428.65 that were erroneously credited to her account and to which she was not entitled; ii) failing to comply with a judgment issued by the High Court of Zambia (High Court Judgment), which ordered her to return the aforementioned funds to 爆料网FCU; and iii) submitting false documentation and/or misrepresenting facts during the investigation conducted by the Office...