爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 491 - 500 of 1669
2010-爆料网AT-091, Abdallah

爆料网AT held that the Appellant was unable to show any illegality of fact, procedure or law in the 爆料网DT judgment which might have compelled it to decide in his favour. 爆料网AT held that to report to work on time, regularly, and without break is a basic duty of anyone who is employed. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was given a fair hearing before 爆料网DT and the reasons for 爆料网DT dismissing his appeal were valid. 爆料网AT held that the decision not to renew the Appellant’s contract was validly taken and called for no interference. 爆料网AT rejected the appeal.

2010-爆料网AT-090, Umpleby

爆料网AT held that the appeal was filed after the deadline for filing appeals had passed and therefore the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the needless forwarding of an English copy of the Judgment to the applicant for her information did not constitute an exceptional case that would justify the extension of the deadline, considering the previous unambiguous communication of the original version of the Judgment in French. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

2010-爆料网AT-089, Cabrera

爆料网AT held, in agreement with 爆料网DT, that: the Appellant was properly subjected to a disciplinary hearing; the disciplinary procedures operated fairly; the Appellant disclosed his part in the events at a time when he had no option but to do so; the Appellant did not report the fact he received the hospitality from a vendor; the Appellant substantially admitted the allegations; the Appellant put at risk the reputation and standing of the 爆料网 Procurement Division; there was sufficient material before the Secretary-General, after a fair and impartial investigation, and having regard to the Appellant...

2010-爆料网AT-088, Megerditchian

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to find that it was not competent to consider the application as far as it concerned the decision not to award Ms Megerditchian a service contract since such contracts were awarded to non-staff members. However, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in receiving the application in respect of a service contract. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in its interpretation of the term priority consideration and that a promise of priority consideration in a job application did not by itself give rise to a legal right on the part of Ms...

2010-爆料网AT-087, Liyanarachchige

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had erred in law by upholding the decision to summarily dismiss the staff member, which was taken in violation of the requirements of adversarial proceedings and due process. 爆料网AT held that, while the use of statements gathered in the course of an investigation from witnesses who remain anonymous throughout the proceedings, including before 爆料网AT, cannot be excluded as a matter of principle from disciplinary matters, a disciplinary measure may not be founded solely on anonymous statements. 爆料网AT ordered rescission of the contested decision to summarily dismiss the staff...

2010-爆料网AT-082, Castelli

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence in ordering the payment of interest from the due date of the relocation grant, but that 爆料网DT had erred in setting the interest rate at 8 per cent. 爆料网AT held that both 爆料网DT and 爆料网AT must have the power to award interest in the normal course of ordering compensation. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment and Order No. 30 to the extent that 爆料网DT awarded interest on the relocation grant and replaced the interest rate of 8 per cent with the United States prime rate applicable on 4 May 2008 (5 per cent).

2010-爆料网AT-078, Zhang

爆料网AT noted that, even though it found the case non-receivable, 爆料网DT undertook a final review of the Appellant’s allegations and that the case failed on the facts. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the decisions contested in the application, namely that the matters contested did not constitute administrative decisions and therefore her application was not receivable. 爆料网AT held there was no basis to disagree with 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

2010-爆料网AT-081, Azzouni

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in failing to consider adequately the Appellant’s evidence, noting she was not given the opportunity to prove her case, including allegations of discrimination, at the 爆料网DT hearing, which included the opportunity to call evidence and to challenge the Administration’s evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in allowing testimony to be given at the hearing that was neither sworn, affirmed, nor made under a promise, to tell the truth. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal, set aside the 爆料网DT judgment and ordered reinstatement or the award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement in...

2010-爆料网AT-080, Streb

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT adequately applied the appropriate principles set out in the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 1391 (2008) in considering whether or not a case of serious misconduct had been established and if so, whether the sanction of summary dismissal was appropriate. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the Appellant accepted lavish hospitality was a clear violation of the Procurement Division’s Guidelines on Acceptance of Gifts and Hospitality by the Procurement Division Staff. Although the misconduct was based on a single incident, 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that it would have been...

2010-爆料网AT-079, Sethia

爆料网AT held that the repeated requests by the Appellant to the management over a period of seven years for a correction of his entry-level were mere restatements of the original claim and did not stop the deadline for contesting the decision from running. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not have the power to waive or suspend the deadline for requesting administrative review under the old internal justice system (Costa (2010-爆料网AT-036)). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in applying the decision in Rosca (爆料网DT/2009/052), which was disproved by 爆料网AT in Costa, but that the error did not affect the outcome...