爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to find that it was not competent to consider the application as far as it concerned the decision not to award Ms Megerditchian a service contract since such contracts were awarded to non-staff members. However, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in receiving the application in respect of a service contract. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in its interpretation of the term priority consideration and that a promise of priority consideration in a job application did not by itself give rise to a legal right on the part of Ms Megerditchian. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Administration caused harm to Ms Megerditchian. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal, rescinded the 爆料网DT judgment and vacated the award of damages.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ms Megerditchian contested the non-renewal of her service contract. 爆料网DT found partly for Ms Megerditchian and awarded compensation.
Legal Principle(s)
Priority consideration cannot be interpreted as a promise or guarantee to be appointed or to receive that for which one is considered in priority.