爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 191 - 200 of 319
    2015-爆料网AT-566, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make an error of law in concluding that the Appellant’s application was not receivable ratione materiae. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that there was no implied administrative decision to challenge at the time the Appellant filed his judicial review application and that his application was also not receivable on that basis. 爆料网AT found no errors of fact or law by 爆料网DT in awarding costs against the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was well-aware of his obligation to comply with Staff Rule 11.2(a), yet he: (a) intentionally failed to seek management...

    2015-爆料网AT-573, Walden

    爆料网AT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-436 as well as a motion requesting that 爆料网AT strike certain paragraphs from it. 爆料网AT held that the request did not fulfil the statutory requirements and constituted, in fact, a disguised attempt to re-open the case. 爆料网AT held that his application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.

    2015-爆料网AT-531, Rangel

    爆料网AT considered seven motions submitted by Ms Rangel prior to a judgment on the merits. On the two Motions for Interim Relief, 爆料网AT held that Ms Rangel did not seek an interim measure for temporary relief consistent with the pronouncements of the ICJ Conciliation Committee, but rather she sought interim relief in cases where the Committee had dismissed her applications. 爆料网AT held that since one of the two cumulative conditions under Article 9(4) of the 爆料网AT Statute was not fulfilled, it did not need to further consider the second condition. 爆料网AT denied the requests for interim relief. On the...

    2015-爆料网AT-568, Lebouef et al.

    On the Appellants’ motion for contempt and request to strike specific paragraphs from the Respondent’s Answer, 爆料网AT found no basis to grant the relief sought but stated it would deal with the issue in the judgment. On the Appellants’ complaints about the number of witnesses permitted to testify, 爆料网AT held that: insofar as the Appellants’ sought to impugn the 爆料网DT judgment on the basis of the number of witnesses permitted to testify, there was no merit in such an argument and it found no error of procedure such as to affect the decision in the case; and there was no merit in the argument that...

    2015-爆料网AT-530, Ovcharenko et al.

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Ovcharenko et al. and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. On the request of Mr Ovcharenko et al. for an oral hearing before the full bench of 爆料网AT, 爆料网AT held that the parties had no standing to request that the case be decided by a full bench and, accordingly, denied the request. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct when it examined the merits of the application and concluded that the administrative decision was lawful. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had to comply with the General Assembly decision 67/551 of 24 December 2012 and the ensuing enactment of...

    2015-爆料网AT-529, Riano

    爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment Nos. 爆料网RWA/DT/2013/035 and 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/004. 爆料网AT held that there was no basis to support the Appellant’s claim of legitimate expectations and/or rights for the renewal of his contract. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred with respect to the amount awarded for al damages. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT evaluated all the evidence before it and made a reasoned assessment as to the amount of anxiety and stress suffered by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the determination of 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held...

    2015-爆料网AT-526, Tintukasiri et al

    On the Appellants’ request for an oral hearing, 爆料网AT held that it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case since the sole issue on appeal was an issue of law (receivability). On the Appellants’ request that the appeal be heard by a full bench, 爆料网AT held that neither the President nor any two judges sitting on the appeal found the case raised a significant question of law warranting a full bench and denied the request. 爆料网AT held that: 爆料网DT was competent to review its own competence or jurisdiction; 爆料网DT correctly applied the jurisprudence of 爆料网AT in the definition of...

    2015-爆料网AT-524, Utkina

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application to file a reply to the Secretary-General’s answer and her motion to file additional evidence. On the issue of redaction, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s concerns were unfounded because the judgments referenced her professional profile only in a general way and did not detail the confidential matters raised by the Appellant in her submission. 爆料网AT agreed with the findings of 爆料网DT that the previous judgment with the Appellant’s name as written had already been in the public domain for a long time and no useful purpose would be...

    2015-爆料网AT-517, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT held that there was no reason to depart from its prior analysis that the 爆料网JSPF was not part of the Secretariat and neither the Secretary-General nor the executive head of any other member organisation, has authority over the management of 爆料网JSPF or the independence of the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网JSPF in the administration of its staff. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had no power to interfere or intervene in the election of members to the 爆料网JSPF’s staff pension committees; those elections were governed exclusively by 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT...

    2015-爆料网AT-515, von der Schulenburg

    爆料网AT considered the consolidated appeals of judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2013/178 and 爆料网DT/2014/041. The Appellant had filed Motions to Withdraw and Strike both of his appeals on the ground that mediation was successful and all claims/disputes were settled between the parties. 爆料网AT granted the Appellant’s motions and directed the Registrar to close 爆料网AT Case Nos. 2014-589 and 2014-621.