爆料网

Article 30

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 5 of 5
    576 (2024), Jacques Cramatte et al.
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT did not consider the seasonal absences of legal staff to be an exceptional circumstance. The 爆料网AT found that, on the contrary, it was routinely expected that staff will take annual leave in the summer months. The 爆料网AT further held that the fact that the Director General had failed to view any e-mail for a period of 19 days was an error for which the consequences had to be borne by the Director General. The 爆料网AT denied the Director General’s motion for an extension of time to file a response to the staff members’ motion.

    爆料网DT/2023/133, Ocokoru

    This application does not meet the requirements of art. 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and art. 30 of the 爆料网DT Rules of Procedure. There is no need to clarify the meaning of Judgment Ocokoru 爆料网DT/2015/004 since it was fully implemented years ago. Furthermore, the grounds submitted by the Applicant as a basis for interpretation have already been clearly and unambiguously determined by this Tribunal previously. Consequently, the Tribunal dismisses the application in its entirety.

    2016-爆料网AT-616, Tiwathia

    爆料网AT held that pursuant to Article 30 爆料网AT RoP and considering the medical condition of Appellant’s counsel, it was in the interests of justice to grant the Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file her comments on the Secretary-General’s motion to supplement his answer. 爆料网AT accepted the Appellant’s comments on the Secretary-General’s motion as timely filed. 爆料网AT denied the Secretary-General’s motion for leave to supplement his answer since his additional pleadings would not advance or assist with the disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had very thoroughly considered the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1049, Kisia

    爆料网AT held that exceptional circumstances existed on the basis that the Appellant was suffering from a medical condition, hospitalized and unable to file the appeal on a timely basis. 爆料网AT waived the deadline for appeal and held the appeal to be receivable. 爆料网AT held that, in his appeal, the Appellant largely repeated the submissions and allegations raised before 爆料网DT, without identifying the specific errors of law or errors of fact that resulted in a manifestly unreasonable decision. On the Appellant’s claims relating to the use of and access to the closed-circuit television (CCTV) video...