爆料网

Article 25

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 21
    2025-爆料网AT-1582, Olexandr Maruschak

    The 爆料网AT observed that there may have been some ambiguity in paragraph 104 of the 爆料网AT Judgment for which the Secretary-General requested interpretation. The 爆料网AT held that the appropriate interpretation was that when the 爆料网DT renders its new decision on Article 10(5) and 10(6) of the 爆料网DT Statute, then the non-prevailing party may appeal the new 爆料网DT judgment in its entirety, including the 爆料网DT’s holding on the merits.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Secretary-General’s application for interpretation is admissible and granted. It further noted that once the 爆料网DT fully exercises its jurisdiction on...

    2025-爆料网AT-1607, John Zumbu Massamba

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member filed his appeal within the statutory deadline.It noted that since he filed his application before the 爆料网DT in French, the 60-day time limit for filing his appeal ran from the date of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment in that same language.As he received the 爆料网DT Judgment in French on 15 January 2025 and filed his appeal on 20 February 2025, the 爆料网AT held that it was filed timely.

    Nevertheless, the 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s application before the 爆料网DT was not receivable ratione temporis.The 爆料网AT observed that the former staff member...

    2025-爆料网AT-1518, Humphreys Timothy Shumba

    The 爆料网AT held that, since the purpose of compensation in lieu is to place a staff member in the same position he or she would have been had the Organization complied with its contractual obligations, the net base salary to be paid in accordance with the 爆料网AT Judgment was the net base salary that the former staff member would have earned at the date of the contested decision and his separation from service, namely 20 May 2021. Therefore, the 爆料网AT concluded that the Secretary-General’s calculation of two years’ net base salary was appropriate.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the deductions made for...

    2025-爆料网AT-1519, Fernando Salon

    The 爆料网AT rejected Mr. Salon’s argument that the prior 爆料网AT Judgment made incorrect findings of fact regarding the dates that he made requests for management evaluation or filed complaints. The 爆料网AT held that Mr. Salon was not seeking clarification of the 爆料网AT Judgment but was rather attempting to relitigate his case, which is not an appropriate use of the 爆料网AT Statute’s provisions for an application for interpretation.

    The 爆料网AT found that there was no ambiguity in its Judgment and there was no basis for the application for interpretation. The meaning and scope of the 爆料网AT Judgment was clear...

    2024-爆料网AT-1438, Ann-Christin Raschdorf

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision, finding that none of the alleged new facts were “new facts” for the purpose of Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The alleged new facts either occurred after the issuance of the 爆料网AT Judgment, were known to the Appeals Tribunal, or matters of law.

    The 爆料网AT granted the application for correction in part, to the extent that the 爆料网AT agreed with Ms. Raschdorf's argument that an error arose in paragraph 44 of the 爆料网AT Judgment where the 爆料网AT wrongly referred to the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims instead of the Pension Fund.

    Finally, the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1380, Said Hassan Awad

    The 爆料网AT found that the relief sought in the application concerned an issue not previously raised before the 爆料网DT or the 爆料网AT, being the recovery of an amount already paid as an admissible expense on a sliding scale.

    The 爆料网AT held that there was nothing in the meaning or scope of the prior Judgment that was unclear or ambiguous, the terms of the order were clear. The 爆料网AT noted there was no need to interpret the prior Judgment to clarify its meaning, nor were there reasonable doubts about what constituted the 爆料网AT’s decision or the reasons for it.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that there was also...

    2022-爆料网AT-1237, Ade Mamonyane Beatrice Lekoetje

    The 爆料网AT reviewed the submission of the Secretary-General that Ms. Lekoetje had already repaid the amounts due to the Organization when she separated from service. The 爆料网AT acknowledged that Ms. Lekoetje agreed with the Secretary-General’s position, and confirmed that USD 20,987.91 had already been deducted from her final entitlements.

    Accordingly, the 爆料网AT accepted this position, and interpreted Judgment No. 2022-爆料网AT-1227 as requiring a payment by the Organization to Ms. Lekoetje of a sum equal to one year’s net base salary, but without any further deductions.

    2022-爆料网AT-1191, Abdalla Abdalla

    Mr. Abdalla filed an application for revision and interpretation of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1078, claiming that the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal had a suspensive effect on the ongoing proceedings in the 爆料网DT, that therefore the extended time limit to file an application would not have elapsed, and thus his ultimate application should be received; and that once 爆料网AT had dismissed the Secretary-General's appeal, it should have remanded the case for further adjudication. 爆料网AT found that Mr. Abdalla had failed to point to any statement or consideration in the 爆料网AT Judgment which would...

    2022-爆料网AT-1257, Alex Lucchini

    Mr. Lucchini and the Secretary-General disagreed on whether 爆料网AT confirmed the 爆料网DT’s award of compensation for moral damages, in addition to increasing the amount of in lieu compensation from 10 months to 24 months, or ordered payment of the increased amount of compensation in lieu (of two years’ net base salary) but did not include the original award of compensation for moral harm that had been ordered by the 爆料网DT. Mr. Lucchini filed an application for interpretation seeking confirmation of his view that 爆料网AT’s ruling increased the amount of in lieu compensation from 10 to 24 months’ net...

    2022-爆料网AT-1255, Boubacar Dieng

    The Secretary-General sought interpretation, revision, and execution of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1118, on grounds that he was unable to effectuate the compensation awarded in the 爆料网DT Judgment because Mr. Dieng refused to provide his banking details. 爆料网AT held that the Judgment was clear, written in plain and unambiguous language, and it left no reasonable doubt as to what it meant. Thus, there was no need for clarification. 爆料网AT further found that the Secretary-General had failed to argue that he had discovered a decisive fact which was unknown to the Appeals Tribunal at the time the Judgment...