爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application to file a reply to the Secretary-General’s answer and her motion to file additional evidence. On the issue of redaction, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s concerns were unfounded because the judgments referenced her professional profile only in a general way and did not detail the confidential matters raised by the Appellant in her submission. 爆料网AT agreed with the findings of 爆料网DT that the previous judgment with the Appellant’s name as written had already been in the public domain for a long time and no useful purpose would be served by an order of redaction. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant requested to withdraw her case and the redaction of all documents related to her case on the 爆料网 Office of Administration of Justice website, including a previous judgment on Suspension. 爆料网DT accepted the Appellant’s withdrawal of her application on the merits and rejection the Appellant’s request for redaction.
Legal Principle(s)
Redaction is only permitted where it is necessary to protect the information of a confidential and sensitive nature.