爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 691 - 700 of 1669
2012-爆料网AT-267, Achkar

爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since there was no need for further clarification of the issues arising from the appeal. 爆料网AT held that it had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal and that the appeal was receivable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it had no subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because the application was brought before the wrong tribunal and the application should have been brought before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because...

2012-爆料网AT-251, Xu

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that “consideration” of a candidate for the purposes of ST/AI/2006/3 did not necessarily mean that a candidate can only be meaningfully considered once the relevant assessment tools have been administered to the candidates and the outcome communicated to them. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the Administration invited the 30-day mark candidates to undertake a written test before the assessment of the 15-day mark candidates was completed did not mean that the Appellant was not afforded priority consideration. 爆料网AT noted that the written test had taken...

2012-爆料网AT-249, di Giacomo

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on the question of competence in finding that, pursuant to Articles 2. 1 and 3. 1 of the 爆料网DT Statute, it was limited to cases brought by staff members, former staff members or persons making claims in the name of incapacitated or deceased staff members of the 爆料网. 爆料网AT held that the access to 爆料网DT and 爆料网AT was not recognised in the new internal justice system. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2012-爆料网AT-250, Rantsiou

爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request to have all appeal-related documents removed from her 爆料网RWA official service file. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding no irregularity in the decision-making process under judicial review and consequently dismissing the application. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had to persuade it that there were flaws in the contested administrative decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment, the proceedings that led to it, or in the 爆料网RWA DT’s judgment, which would warrant vacating the judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not raised new arguments...

2012-爆料网AT-257, Baron

爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing considering it not necessary and that it would unduly delay the delivery of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that appeals against decisions taken in the course of proceedings, including orders imposing interim measures, were non-receivable, even when 爆料网DT committed an error of law or fact. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网DT judgment.

2012-爆料网AT-258, Kananura

爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the 爆料网DT’s exercise of its jurisdictional powers, conferred on 爆料网DT by its Statute, which enables cases to be judged fairly and expeditiously. 爆料网AT held that the complaints made by the Secretary-General fell squarely within the jurisdiction and competence of 爆料网DT, notwithstanding the alleged breach of procedural fairness. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2012-爆料网AT-259, De Saint Robert

爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to put forward evidence that the selection process for the post for which she had applied had been vitiated by any irregularity or of the existence of bias or misconduct in considering her candidacy. 爆料网AT held that all the stages of the procedure had been followed and that the Appellant had benefitted from an objective examination and equal treatment to which all applicants are entitled. 爆料网AT held that, in view of the evidence, the Appellant had no real chance of being appointed or shortlisted between the three candidates recommended. 爆料网AT held that...

2012-爆料网AT-260, Rahman

爆料网AT held that it was not in dispute that the Appellant did not submit a request for management evaluation until more than one year after he had been notified that he had not been selected for the post in question. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, under Article 11.1 of the 爆料网DT Statute, was obliged to issue a judgment in writing, stating the reasons, facts, and law on which it was based. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s decisions, that the Appellant had been properly served with a notification in writing in compliance with former Staff Rule 111.2 and that Article 8.3 prohibited 爆料网DT from extending the deadline for...

2012-爆料网AT-245, Muratore

爆料网AT held that the Appellant was asking for a review of his case in order to enhance the award and that he merely repeated arguments already considered and accepted by 爆料网DT, which was not the purpose of an appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not met the burden of demonstrating that the 爆料网DT had erred in assessing the damages. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on a question of fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision on this point. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2012-爆料网AT-256, Benchebbak

爆料网AT considered the three appeals by the Secretary-General against the 爆料网DT Orders. 爆料网AT held that the appeals were receivable because: (1) 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 2. 2 of the 爆料网DT Statute by ordering the suspension of the contested decision beyond the date of completion of management evaluation; and (2) 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 10. 2 of the 爆料网DT Statute by ordering, during the proceedings, a suspension of the contested decision as an interim measure in a case of appointment. 爆料网AT held that Order No. 129 suspended the contested decision beyond...