爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on the question of competence in finding that, pursuant to Articles 2. 1 and 3. 1 of the 爆料网DT Statute, it was limited to cases brought by staff members, former staff members or persons making claims in the name of incapacitated or deceased staff members of the 爆料网. 爆料网AT held that the access to 爆料网DT and 爆料网AT was not recognised in the new internal justice system. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to pursue a disciplinary case against him or the decision to restrict his access to the 爆料网 premises under security escort. 爆料网DT dismissed the application concluding that it had no jurisdiction. The Applicant appealed and later filed a motion for removal of certain portions from the Secretary-General’s answer to his appeal and for confidentiality. The motion was granted, and the Secretary-General filed a revised answer.
Legal Principle(s)
While 爆料网AT has recognised that access to the new system of administration of justice could be extended to a person who is not formally a staff member but who could legitimately be entitled to rights similar to those of a staff member, this exception must be understood in a restrictive sense.