爆料网

Article 2.1

  • Article 1
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.3
  • Article 10.4
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.7
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 105
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 11.5
  • Article 11.6
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.2
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 12.4
  • Article 12.5
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.7(b)
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 3
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 3.1(a)
  • Article 3.1(b)
  • Article 3.1(c)
  • Article 32
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 4.5
  • Article 4.9
  • Article 6
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.2(e)
  • Article 7.2(h)
  • Article 7.2(i)
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(b)
  • Article 8.1(b)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)–(iv)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(a)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iv)
  • Article 8.1(i)
  • Article 8.1(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(ii)
  • Article 8.1(ii)(c)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.2(d)(i)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.3(a)
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.5
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(a)
  • Article 8(c)
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 8(d)(ii)
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 231
    2026-爆料网AT-1634, Themba Ralph Phakathi

    The 爆料网AT held that the issues on appeal were whether the 爆料网DT erred in finding that the staff member received full and fair consideration for the Temporary Job Opening, whether it erred in concluding that the non?selection decision was untainted by bias, discrimination, or other extraneous considerations, and whether it erred in declaring certain claims not receivable for failure to request management evaluation. It recalled that its role on appeal is not to conduct a de novo review, but to determine whether the 爆料网DT committed an error of law, fact, or procedure resulting in an unreasonable...

    2026-爆料网AT-1623, Dorah Likukela

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable.

    Regarding the former staff member’s claims concerning the alleged theft of her wages, the alleged lack of a legal basis for the recovery of her final pay, and the alleged illegal withholding of her final pay, the 爆料网AT found that these claims were not receivable ratione materiae, because she failed to request management evaluation of the contested decisions within the statutory time limit.In this regard, the 爆料网AT further held that her ignorance or misunderstanding of the law...

    爆料网DT/2025/064, Iacovino

    Receivability

    After considering the evidence on record, the Tribunal found that the challenge to the decision to abolish the Applicant’s post and terminate his continuing appointment was not receivable. It held that the only matter before it was the decision not to extend the Applicant’s employment to cover his sick leave, but instead to terminate his appointment and separate him while he was on certified sick leave.

    Merits

    First, the Tribunal assessed whether the Applicant was on certified sick leave at the time of his separation on 31 December 2023.

    Although sick leave was not formally recorded...

    2025-爆料网AT-1606, Anna Stepanova

    The 爆料网AT noted that the Mobility AI was not a decision of “individual application” but a general instruction applicable to all staff members who entered on duty on or after 1 October 2023, as Ms. Stepanova did.

    Ms. Stepanova was attempting to modify the terms of appointment or the contract of employment, by exempting herself from the application of the Mobility AI and she was therefore not challenging “non-compliance” with “the terms of appointment or the contract of employment”, which is what is required under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网DT Statute. Accordingly, the 爆料网AT held that her claim was...

    2025-爆料网AT-1601, ATR

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that ATR’s claim for compensation as a victim of sexual harassment was not receivable because the contested administrative decision did not concern compensation and the applicable legal framework does not provide for such entitlement. The 爆料网AT noted that while Article 10(5)(b) of the 爆料网DT Statute allows for compensation for harm, this remedy must relate to the administrative decision under review, which in this case concerned disclosure of disciplinary measures, not compensation.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction in...

    2025-爆料网AT-1537, Aiman Mackie

    The 爆料网AT held that the contested decision was a separation decision hinged on expiration of an appointment, and not a termination decision based on abolition of post or reduction of staff. The former staff member did not fall within the category of staff with the right to be considered on a preferential basis for retention and the Administration did not have an obligation to find him an alternative and suitable position following the abolition or reclassification exercise.

    The 爆料网AT observed that although the former staff member was informed in his non-renewal letter that he would be placed on...

    2025-爆料网AT-1555, Carolina Larriera

    The Appeals Tribunal analyzed the text of Appendix D, from the 1966 version, and concluded that: (a) widows are eligible to receive compensation at a rate of two-fifths of a deceased staff member’s annual salary; (b) if the deceased staff member is survived by more than one widow, the compensation shall be split evenly between the widows; (c) all pension benefits paid through the staff member’s 爆料网JSPF entitlement shall be deducted from the compensation paid under Appendix D; and the deduction shall not reduce the amount of Appendix D compensation otherwise payable to less than 10 per cent of...

    2025-爆料网AT-1517, Ayesha Al Rifai

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to support that the applicant had engaged in abuse of authority by intimidating a staff member to file a false complaint of sexual harassment against another staff member. The 爆料网RWA DT weighed the conflicting testimonies and assessed the credibility of the witnesses and found that she had a motive to solicit the false complaint.

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in declining to review the other misconduct allegations against her, given that the abuse of authority allegation was the...

    爆料网DT/2025/013, Martin Akerman

    The Court found that the Applicant failed to demonstrate the existence of exceptional circumstances or factors beyond his control that prevented him from filing a timely application for enforcement of the Settlement Agreement (see, e.g., Gelsei 2020-爆料网AT-1035, paras. 19-24).

     

    In any event, the Trtibunal considered that a period of six and a half years to request enforcement was excessive.

    爆料网DT/2025/007, MP

    The Applicant was notified of the decision to deny his gross negligence claim on 8 April 2024, it did not meet the definition of “administrative decision” within the meaning of art. 2.1(a) of the Tribunal’s Statute.

    Because alleged negligence by United Nations officials is not a cause of action available to staff members and is beyond the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, the Applicant could not bring a claim of gross negligence.

    The Applicant was notified of the decision to deny his gross negligence claim on 8 April 2024. He was required to request management evaluation within 60 calendar days from...