爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
On the basis that the Appellant did not raise claims under the 爆料网AT Statute, reargued the claims he presented to 爆料网DT and failed to explain how 爆料网DT erred in deciding his claims, 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law or fact in denying the Appellant’s application and concluding that the selection process was correctly followed, the candidate was fully and fairly considered and there was no bias or procedural flaw. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly refused to address the Appellant’s various claims of harassment on the ground that he failed to establish proof of harassment against him, or how these allegations might have impacted his non-selection. On discrimination,
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to select him for a post. 爆料网DT rejected his application.
Legal Principle(s)
On appeal, the appellant has the burden to establish that the 爆料网DT judgment is defective.