爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member. 爆料网AT held that the evidence supported the conclusion that the decision not to appoint the Appellant was overall lawful and did not violate her rights. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was not deprived of any significant chance of being promoted because there were other candidates ranked higher than her. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate any errors in the 爆料网DT judgment regarding the merits of the administrative decision that would warrant 爆料网AT’s intervention. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that she was not properly represented before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网DT judgment: The Applicant contested the decision not to appoint her to a P-5 post and claimed that she had been improperly excluded from the promotion. 爆料网DT found that the decision not to appoint the Applicant to the P-5 position was valid and lawful. However, 爆料网DT found that there was “inappropriate imprecision and confusion of the matrices” which contributed to the Applicant’s frustration and justified an award of compensation. 爆料网DT awarded the Applicant the sum of USD 1,000.
Legal Principle(s)
An appeal is not an opportunity for the parties to reargue their case. It does not fall to 爆料网AT to conduct a new trial.