2010-��AT-035

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The Administration paid the compensation ordered by ��DT and the Secretary-General subsequently filed his cross-appeal challenging ��DT��s decision to award compensation. ��AT held that, by paying the compensation ordered, the Secretary-General accepted the ��DT judgment and that his cross-appeal was, therefore, moot.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The staff member appealed the decision to reassign her to another post. ��DT held that the Administration provided balanced and objectively verifiable reasons for the decision to reassign the staff member from one post to another. However, ��DT found that the way the Administration handled the situation caused the staff member unnecessary stress and anxiety. Therefore, ��DT awarded a one-month net base salary as compensation for the suffering and stress.

Legal Principle(s)

Payment of compensation ordered by ��DT amounts to acceptance of the ��DT judgment. Therefore, the party��s subsequent cross-appeal challenging the award of compensation is moot.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Crichlow

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement