爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s submissions were largely a reiteration of his arguments before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that there was no indication that the non-renewal decision or other incidents amounted to harassment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err when it concluded that the behaviours at stake, even when viewed together, did not point to any kind of prohibited conduct in the sense of ST/SGB/2008/5. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s findings that the advice given to the Appellant regarding uncertified sick leave was correct. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s allegation that the decision not to approve his annual leave request was arbitrary and capricious had no foundation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly applied the criteria for launching a fact-finding investigation and the Appellant had not demonstrated any error in 爆料网DT’s finding that the decision, that there were not sufficient grounds to warrant a fact-finding investigation, was tainted by any procedural flaw. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not established that 爆料网DT overlooked violations of his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not demonstrated any error in the 爆料网DT’s finding that he had not been subjected to harassment and that the decision not to undertake further enquiries was not in breach of his terms of appointment. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision rejecting his requests for investigation into his allegations of harassment, discriminatory treatment and abuse of authority in various forms, including the non-renewal of his appointment. 爆料网DT dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank