爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 81 - 90 of 319
    2010-爆料网AT-029bis, El-Khatib

    The 爆料网AT interpreted the application as a request for a correction of the previous 爆料网AT judgment.

    The 爆料网AT noted that the case file of the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal revealed that the President of that Tribunal had extended the deadline for filing the appeal but a copy of that decision had not been placed in the file submitted to the 爆料网AT. The 爆料网AT observed that it had rendered its judgment to reject the appeal, without being aware of the President's decision.

    The 爆料网AT found, however, that the staff member's appeal was received by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal...

    2023-爆料网AT-1406, Kamal Karki

    The 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for anonymity as the issue presented in his appeal was purely procedural and jurisdictional and did not involve any personal data which had to be protected.

    The 爆料网AT also denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, finding that that it would not assist the Appeals Tribunal in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case.

    The 爆料网AT held that because the Appellant filed his application 93 days after the receipt of the contested administrative decision, it was not receivable, absent waiver of the deadline of the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT observed that given...

    爆料网DT/2023/133, Ocokoru

    This application does not meet the requirements of art. 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and art. 30 of the 爆料网DT Rules of Procedure. There is no need to clarify the meaning of Judgment Ocokoru 爆料网DT/2015/004 since it was fully implemented years ago. Furthermore, the grounds submitted by the Applicant as a basis for interpretation have already been clearly and unambiguously determined by this Tribunal previously. Consequently, the Tribunal dismisses the application in its entirety.

    2023-爆料网AT-1398, Sergio Baltazar Arvizú Trevino

    The 爆料网AT noted that several months after the Secretary-General had been notified of the Judgment, the only action taken was that some responses had been elicited from four staff members alleged in the complaint to have engaged in misconduct and that “these responses alongside the 22 pages and 18 annexes” to the complaint were under review.

    Noting the justification of the Secretary-General for the inaction that in the instant matter, no specific time had been set for execution, the 爆料网AT held that the Administration had not acted as promptly as per the obligations imposed on it, "within a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1395, Abdurrahman Turk

    The 爆料网AT declined Mr. Turk’s request for an oral hearing, and found no error in the 爆料网DT’s decision not to order the production of additional documents.

    The 爆料网AT reaffirmed the legal framework which provides that staff members have no legitimate expectation of any renewal of their fixed-term appointments. The 爆料网AT also confirmed that the Tribunals will not interfere with the Organization’s discretion in restructuring decisions, and that the Tribunals have no authority to review General Assembly decisions related to administrative and budgetary matters. In this case, the 爆料网AT held that the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1382, Flamur Kazazi

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not commit an error of procedure in its case management that affected the outcome of the case. The Appellant had a meaningful opportunity to mount a defense and to question the veracity of the statements against him. The additional witnesses that he wished to call would have been of little assistance to his case.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the alleged conduct was established by clear and convincing evidence and that the Appellant’s actions, i.e., making inappropriate comments of a sexual nature in social settings, amounted to sexual...

    2023-爆料网AT-1388, Yassir Ibrahim Ali Haroun

    The 爆料网AT held that the appeal against the two interlocutory Orders became moot following the issuance of Judgment No. 爆料网DT/2022/124 and that the 爆料网DT did not err in delivering its Judgment during the pendency of that appeal. The 爆料网AT nevertheless observed that the 爆料网DT erred in law by imposing an unreasonably short period for compliance with Order No. 157 (NBI/2022). Despite this, the 爆料网AT concluded that, as the proceeding was unreceivable, this finding did not assist the Appellant in his case. With regard to Order No. 158 (NBI/2022), the 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT rightfully refused to...

    2023-爆料网AT-1386, Didzis Melbiksis

    The 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, finding that that the issues were well-defined and required no further development through an oral hearing.

    The 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s application for review of the response to his request for management evaluation of his non-selection was not receivable ratione materiae as it did not produce direct legal consequences for him and was, therefore, not a reviewable administrative decision.

    The 爆料网AT also found that the Appellant was informed of the outcome of his request for a management evaluation regarding his non-selection...

    2023-爆料网AT-1387, Mazin Ismail Sadieh

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member.

    The 爆料网AT found that the staff member did not cite any provision of Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute and did not indicate whether any errors by the 爆料网RWA DT in his case related to its jurisdiction, the procedure, a question of law or a question of fact. The 爆料网AT held that the appeal was defective and consequently not receivable.

    The 爆料网AT, nevertheless, reiterated its jurisprudence on some of the issues raised, and agreed with the way the 爆料网RWA DT had determined the amount of in-lieu compensation. The 爆料网AT also agreed with the 爆料网RWA DT’s...

    2023-爆料网AT-1383, Mazen Qassem

    As a preliminary matter, the 爆料网AT dismissed Mr. Qassem’s request for an oral hearing. The 爆料网AT found that the factual and legal issues arising from the appeal had been clearly defined by the parties and moreover, an oral hearing would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case”.

    The 爆料网AT found that since Mr. Qassem’s fixed-term appointment was extended beyond 31 March 2020, with no effect given to the initial administrative decision not to renew his employment beyond this date, the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the application was moot since the administrative decision...