爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 241 - 250 of 319
    2017-爆料网AT-733, Nadeau

    爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not committed an error of procedure by denying the Appellant an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT enjoys a wide margin of discretion in all matters relating to case management and there was no error in the proceedings before 爆料网DT with specific consideration of the following: 爆料网DT’s denial of the proceedings to be conducted in French; 爆料网DT’s dismissal of objections to English translations in the application and other documents, 爆料网DT’s issuance of its judgment before having the Secretary-General’s reply...

    2017-爆料网AT-732, Nielsen

    The Appellant appealed judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2016/113 (爆料网AT Case No. 2016-972) and 爆料网DT/2016/114 (爆料网AT Case No. 2016-973). 爆料网AT consolidated the two appeals. The Appellant submitted a motion to withdraw her appeals following the successful conclusion of mediation discussions and the signing of a settlement agreement. 爆料网AT recalled its jurisprudence that there was no reason to require a party to pursue an appeal he or she no longer deems necessary in the context of his or her case. 爆料网AT granted the motion to withdraw the Appellant’s appeals and directed the Registrar to close both 爆料网AT cases.

    2017-爆料网AT-726, Nielsen

    Ms Nielsen appealed judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2016/111 (爆料网AT Case No. 2016-964) and 爆料网DT/2016/114 (爆料网AT Case No. 2016-969). 爆料网AT consolidated the two appeals. Ms Nielsen submitted motions to withdraw her appeals following successful mediation discussions and the signing of a settlement agreement. 爆料网AT granted the motions to withdraw the appeals and directed the Registrar to close both 爆料网AT cases.

    2017-爆料网AT-739, Fayek

    爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s motion for additional pleadings on the basis that exceptional circumstances were not demonstrated. 爆料网AT held that, contrary to the Appellant’s reasoning, fact-finding panels do not fall in the category of technical bodies under Staff Rule 11. 2(b), nor has the Secretary-General designated fact-finding panels established under ST/SGB/2008/5 as technical bodies. 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网DT’s finding that the request for management evaluation was a mandatory first step in the judicial process. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not apply for management evaluation as required...

    2017-爆料网AT-718, Bagot

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of Mr Bagot and the cross-appeal of the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that the Commissioner-General’s cross-appeal was receivable. 爆料网AT agreed with the findings of 爆料网RWA DT that the established facts regarding the lunch and the events that took place in the apartment did not amount to misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the only reasonable conclusion available to the first instance Judge was that the facts of the alleged misconduct were not established by clear and convincing evidence, in light of the plot and the sequence of the events, assessed in conjunction with the...

    2017-爆料网AT-712, Krioutchkov

    On the amount of compensation in lieu of rescission, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly applied Article 10(5) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that there was no fault with the 爆料网DT’s award of compensation of USD 2,000, noting that 爆料网DT considered the chances of success as well as the difference of net base salary between the one Mr. Krioutchkov received at his current grade and step and his potential income as of the relevant date, limited the projection of the difference in salary to two years. 爆料网AT held that absent any error of law or manifestly unreasonable factual findings 爆料网AT would not...

    2017-爆料网AT-711, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT held that the appellant did not identify the alleged defects in the judgment and state the grounds relied upon in asserting that the judgment was defective. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely reiterated allegations already thoroughly examined by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the 爆料网DT findings such as to warrant its reversal. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2017-爆料网AT-761, Michaud

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s motion to adduce additional evidence in the form of an affidavit by him for the absence of exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the Office of Audit and Investigation Services (OAIS) took no decision that materially, adversely, or directly impacted the rights of the Appellant and that it merely made a non-binding recommendation to 爆料网DP. 爆料网AT held that the recommendation by OAIS was not an administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that the appeal in relation to the investigation was not receivable ratione materiae...

    2018-爆料网AT-894, B. Kosbeh et al.

    Having decided that an oral hearing would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case,” as required by Article 18(1) of the RoP, 爆料网AT denied the Applicants’ request for one. 爆料网AT also decided that the Appellants could not introduce additional evidence since that evidence had not been presented before 爆料网RWA DT and no application had been made to 爆料网AT to be allowed to submit that evidence on appeal. 爆料网AT noted that an appeal is not receivable where an Applicant bypassed the jurisdiction of the first instance Judge, by directly lodging an appeal with the Appeals Tribunal against...