爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 11 - 20 of 319
    2026-爆料网AT-1645, Clay Shiala Nsilu

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member filed his appeal within the statutory deadline. It noted that since he filed his application before the 爆料网DT in French, the 60-day time limit for filing his appeal ran from the date of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment in that same language. As he received the 爆料网DT Judgment in French on 11 July 2025 and filed his appeal on 13 August 2025, the 爆料网AT held that it was filed in a timely manner.

    Nevertheless, the 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s application before the 爆料网DT was not receivable. In this regard, the 爆料网AT first rejected his contention...

    2026-爆料网AT-1623, Dorah Likukela

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable.

    Regarding the former staff member’s claims concerning the alleged theft of her wages, the alleged lack of a legal basis for the recovery of her final pay, and the alleged illegal withholding of her final pay, the 爆料网AT found that these claims were not receivable ratione materiae, because she failed to request management evaluation of the contested decisions within the statutory time limit.In this regard, the 爆料网AT further held that her ignorance or misunderstanding of the law...

    2025-爆料网AT-1586, Amjad Issa

    The Tribunal found that Mr. Issa’s application does not satisfy the stringent prerequisites for receivability under the 爆料网AT Statute, namely, that the decisive fact he now relies upon, that all 爆料网RWA offices in the West Bank field were closed completely, was unknown to the Appeals Tribunal and to himself, prior to the Judgment. This was plainly known to Mr. Issa, rendering his application non-receivable on this ground alone.

    The 爆料网AT noted that Mr. Issa does not present, or even purport to possess, evidence that he in fact had complied with 爆料网RWA’s directives to advise the Agency of his...

    2024-爆料网AT-1494, Zafarkhon Sheralov

    The 爆料网AT first considered the staff member’s request for an oral hearing, and decided it was not necessary for the expeditious and fair disposal of his case.

    The 爆料网AT observed that when the only persons present in a physical assault are the perpetrator and the victim, an oral hearing may be useful for reaching credibility findings. However, in this case, the 爆料网AT noted that the staff member and his counsel agreed that they had no witnesses to present at an oral hearing and preferred to rely on the investigation report. In these circumstances, the 爆料网DT did not err in not holding an oral hearing...

    2025-爆料网AT-1603, Giovanni Ardito, David Pusztai

    The 爆料网AT noted that the JAB is specifically empowered to rule on a request for suspension of action which is within its jurisdiction and competence, so there was no basis for the 爆料网AT to consider the appeals unless and until there is a timely application from a decision on the merits. At such time, the 爆料网AT may consider, if appropriate, the due process issues raised in the currently appeal by the former ISA staff members.

    The 爆料网AT noted that oral hearings would not assist the Tribunal with the fair and expeditious disposition of the case as there is no justification to hold oral hearings when...

    2025-爆料网AT-1582, Olexandr Maruschak

    The 爆料网AT observed that there may have been some ambiguity in paragraph 104 of the 爆料网AT Judgment for which the Secretary-General requested interpretation. The 爆料网AT held that the appropriate interpretation was that when the 爆料网DT renders its new decision on Article 10(5) and 10(6) of the 爆料网DT Statute, then the non-prevailing party may appeal the new 爆料网DT judgment in its entirety, including the 爆料网DT’s holding on the merits.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Secretary-General’s application for interpretation is admissible and granted. It further noted that once the 爆料网DT fully exercises its jurisdiction on...

    2025-爆料网AT-1599, Faten Hatem Al Dawoud

    The 爆料网AT held that the appeal was timely, as Article 11(5) of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute provides that the filing period begins upon receipt of the Arabic translation of the judgment when the application was originally submitted in Arabic. Since Ms. Al Dawoud received the Arabic version on 9 January 2025 and filed her appeal on 10 March 2025, the appeal was timely.

    On the merits, the 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT correctly identified the Agency’s error in treating an email shared by Ms. Al Dawoud as confidential and acknowledged the harm caused by the erroneous disciplinary measure. However, the 爆料网AT...

    2025-爆料网AT-1607, John Zumbu Massamba

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member filed his appeal within the statutory deadline.It noted that since he filed his application before the 爆料网DT in French, the 60-day time limit for filing his appeal ran from the date of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment in that same language.As he received the 爆料网DT Judgment in French on 15 January 2025 and filed his appeal on 20 February 2025, the 爆料网AT held that it was filed timely.

    Nevertheless, the 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s application before the 爆料网DT was not receivable ratione temporis.The 爆料网AT observed that the former staff member...

    2025-爆料网AT-1614, Raul Antonio de Melo Cabral

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding the extensions of administrative leave with pay lawful, as the Administration reasonably assessed the risk to workplace harmony given the appellant’s senior role.

    The 爆料网AT agreed that the refusals to complete ePAS evaluations and to approve a subordinate’s workplan and telecommuting request constituted insubordination under Staff Rule 1.2(a), which requires compliance with instructions properly issued by supervisors. It clarified that staff must follow instructions even if they believe them unlawful, unless criminal, and that “properly issued”...

    2025-爆料网AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas

    The 爆料网AT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant’s signature. The 爆料网AT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant’s dementia.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant’s mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The 爆料网AT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...