爆料网

2026-爆料网AT-1645

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member filed his appeal within the statutory deadline. It noted that since he filed his application before the 爆料网DT in French, the 60-day time limit for filing his appeal ran from the date of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment in that same language. As he received the 爆料网DT Judgment in French on 11 July 2025 and filed his appeal on 13 August 2025, the 爆料网AT held that it was filed in a timely manner.

Nevertheless, the 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s application before the 爆料网DT was not receivable. In this regard, the 爆料网AT first rejected his contention that the 爆料网DT failed to examine the implied decision he was contesting, finding that it was improperly raised for the first time on appeal. The 爆料网AT also found that he failed to identify a contestable administrative decision. Finally, the 爆料网AT concluded that, in any event, the former staff member did not submit any request for management evaluation.

The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed Judgment No. 爆料网DT/2025/033.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

A 爆料网ICEF former staff member contested the manner in which the Administration handled his compensation claim under Appendix D of the Staff Rules, relating to an injury he allegedly sustained at work on 28 February 2021.

In its Judgment on Receivability No. 爆料网DT/2025/033, the 爆料网DT dismissed the former staff member’s application on the grounds that he had not identified an appealable administrative decision and had not submitted a request for management evaluation of the contested decision.

Former staff member appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

An appeal is receivable if it is filed within 60 calendar days of the receipt of the 爆料网DT judgment.An individual applicant or respondent shall receive a copy of the 爆料网DT judgment in the language in which the original application was submitted, unless he/she requests a copy in another official language of the United Nations.In such cases, the date of receipt of the translated version of the judgment is considered the date of receipt of the judgment for the purpose of the computation of time limits pursuant to Article 7(1)(c) of the 爆料网AT Statute.

A management evaluation is a prerequisite for filing an application with the Dispute Tribunal contesting an administrative decision alleging non-compliance with a staff member’s contract of employment or terms of appointment. The purpose of the management evaluation is to enable the Administration to remedy a contested decision by giving it the opportunity to correct any errors in a swift and effective manner. Failure to comply with the requirement to request a management evaluation or with the relevant deadlines renders the application not receivable.

For the purposes of filing a valid application before the 爆料网DT, a party must identify an administrative decision, express or implied, which has allegedly affected a staff member’s conditions of service.

An appellant cannot present new arguments for the first time before the Appeals Tribunal, as this would violate the two-tier principle of administration of justice.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.