爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 751 - 760 of 1669
2012-爆料网AT-196, Odio-Benito

爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s application was submitted to 爆料网DT after the expiration of the response period; the response period began on the date on which she received a letter from the Management Evaluation Unit informing her that her request for a management evaluation was not receivable because, as a judge, she was not a staff member or a former staff member within the meaning of the Staff Rules. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claims that the 爆料网DT judge erred on a question of fact, by considering the letter as the decision that concluded the management evaluation, and that it erred on a...

2012-爆料网AT-192, Akyeampong

爆料网AT considered appeals from both the Secretary-General and M Akyeampong on the issue of whether Ms Akyeampong could be denied a promotion on account of the two reprimands. 爆料网AT held that the two reprimands had not been an obstacle to Ms Akyeampong filling a D-1 position or being recommended for a promotion. Moreover, 爆料网AT held that the presence of the two reprimands had not debarred her from being promoted during the 2009 annual promotion session. 爆料网AT allowed Ms Akyeampong’s appeal in part, rescinded the impugned decision and dismissed the Secretary-General’s appeal, with Judge Weinberg de...

2012-爆料网AT-193, Al Sayyed

爆料网AT considered Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal and found that the decision to terminate his service, effective from close of business 15 December 2007, and as communicated to him on 30 November 2007, was superseded by the action he took on 4 December 2007, an action reinforced by him on 7 January 2008. Under these circumstances, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA did not err in dismissing Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal against his termination on the basis that there was no termination decision capable of review. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

2012-爆料网AT-194, Kamunyi

爆料网AT considered Mr Kamynyi’s appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT rejected Mr Kamunyi’s appeal in its entirety and held that it is within the Administration’s discretion to reassign a staff member to a different post at the same level and that such a reassignment is lawful if it is reasonable in the particular circumstances of each case and if it causes no economic prejudice to the staff member. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT rightfully rejected Mr Kamunyi’s request for legal costs, noting that no legal costs were owed to a party when the opposing party had not abused the process. With...

2012-爆料网AT-195, Shahatit

爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the established facts showed that the Appellant’s negligence as Head Storekeeper facilitated the misconduct of other staff members and his negligence was evidenced by the excess of merchandise in the storeroom under his control, and by his failure to keep an inventory of the items in his custody. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant neither successfully rebutted these facts, nor demonstrated any flaws in the administrative and disciplinary procedures. 爆料网AT held that the sanction of demotion was lawful. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

2012-爆料网AT-197, Ndjadi

爆料网AT held that the Appellant had neither standing to challenge a decision which he alleged did not comply with the stipulations of his service contract nor the right to request the implementation of an arbitration procedure before 爆料网DT. However, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed an error in concluding that the Appellant had manifestly abused the process. The appeal was partially upheld and the 爆料网DT judgment partially vacated regarding the payment of USD 500.00 for abuse of procedure.

2012-爆料网AT-199, Worsley

爆料网AT considered Ms Worsley’s appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that OSLA’s decision to not represent Ms Worsley was based on her disability. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Worsley did not show how OSLA’s actions affected her rights or her case, as she was simply repeating arguments that 爆料网DT previously considered in its judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment with regard to its decision that the right of staff members to receive assistance from OSLA does not amount to a right to be represented by OSLA.

2012-爆料网AT-198, Meron

爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT correctly stated that the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal considered and rejected all of the Appellant’s other pleas and that for this reason, the matter of interest was res judicata. 爆料网AT also noted that 爆料网DT ordered the Secretary-General to make a payment of USD 25,000 as compensation for the excessive and inordinate delays and the emotional harm and to arrange for a Medical Board to consider outstanding invoices. 爆料网AT found that, as the Secretary-General did not appeal, he had therefore accepted the 爆料网DT’s decision and financial award. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s decision...

2013-爆料网AT-390, Wesslund

爆料网AT considered a writ of mandamus from Ms Wesslund, who requested that 爆料网AT order 爆料网DT to accept her applications. 爆料网AT held that because it did not have inherent or original jurisdiction outside its capacity as an appellate body, it considered the motion for writ of mandamus to be an appeal against 爆料网DT Order No. 100 (NY/2013). 爆料网AT held that the appeal was received beyond the deadline for appeal. Noting that Ms Wesslund did not apply to 爆料网AT for an extension or waive of the applicable time limits, 爆料网AT held that the appeal of the Order was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT dismissed the...