2012-惇蹋厙AT-192

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT considered appeals from both the Secretary-General and M Akyeampong on the issue of whether Ms Akyeampong could be denied a promotion on account of the two reprimands. 惇蹋厙AT held that the two reprimands had not been an obstacle to Ms Akyeampong filling a D-1 position or being recommended for a promotion. Moreover, 惇蹋厙AT held that the presence of the two reprimands had not debarred her from being promoted during the 2009 annual promotion session. 惇蹋厙AT allowed Ms Akyeampong＊s appeal in part, rescinded the impugned decision and dismissed the Secretary-General＊s appeal, with Judge Weinberg de Roca dissenting.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Akyeampong contested the decision to not promote her. 惇蹋厙DT found that the High Commissioner committed a procedural irregularity in the promotion session. 惇蹋厙DT rescinded the contested decision and ordered compensation as an alternative to the rescission. 惇蹋厙DT rejected Ms Akyeampong＊s claim for material damages. 惇蹋厙DT rejected Ms Akyeampong＊s claim for moral damages, finding that Ms Akyeampong had no chance of being promoted even if no irregularity had occurred.

Legal Principle(s)

A reprimand is not an adverse entry like an entry relating to sanction post-disciplinary proceedings. A reprimand is recorded in the staff member＊s file to serve as a reminder and should the staff member commit misconduct again, the Administration may administer a harsher sanction.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits; Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Akyeampong

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry