爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal and found that the decision to terminate his service, effective from close of business 15 December 2007, and as communicated to him on 30 November 2007, was superseded by the action he took on 4 December 2007, an action reinforced by him on 7 January 2008. Under these circumstances, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA did not err in dismissing Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal against his termination on the basis that there was no termination decision capable of review. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网RWA decision: Mr Al Sayyed contested the decision to terminate his service with 爆料网RWA. The 爆料网RWA Commissioner-General rejected this appeal and held that Mr Al Sayyed’s employment relationship with 爆料网RWA ended as a result of his decision to opt for early retirement and not as a result of the termination.
Legal Principle(s)
When an Applicant’s appointment is terminated by their voluntary action, rather than as the result of any wrongful act of the Respondent, there is no basis for the Applicant’s claims and all relief sought is refused.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.