爆料网

English

Showing 951 - 960 of 4321
2010-爆料网AT-050/Corr.1, Nasr Ishak

In Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-050, 爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable since it was not filed within 45 calendar days of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction to receive the Appellant’s appeal before the JAB. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment. In Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-050/Corr.1, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was granted an extension of time to file an appeal to 16 February 2010 and he filed his appeal on that date. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s submission that the appeal was...

2010-爆料网AT-070, Andrysek

爆料网AT considered an appeal that centred on whether the Appellant should be awarded enhanced compensation of three months’ net base salary. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make a reversible error in declining to award compensation for moral suffering. 爆料网AT held that the case was distinguishable from Mebtouche (爆料网DT/2009/039), where the Applicant, Mr Mebtouche, had already retired and had no chance of being promoted, therefore enhanced compensation was justified. 爆料网AT held that enhanced compensation could not be awarded to the Appellant. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2010-爆料网AT-052, Ardisson

爆料网AT held that the appeal was not filed untimely and was, therefore, receivable. 爆料网AT held that, whatever the gravity of the irregularity committed by the Administration and the number of points obtained by the Applicant in the 2007 promotion session, 爆料网DT did not commit an error in providing that the High Commissioner could decide to pay compensation rather than execute the rescission order. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, in setting the amount of compensation at 8,000 Swiss francs, did not make a manifest error. 爆料网AT held, concerning the conclusion that compensation should be paid for moral damages...

2010-爆料网AT-045, Tsoneva

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on a question of law in deciding that the Appellant had to establish that, without the errors committed in the review of her professional career, she would have had a real chance of being promoted. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish that 爆料网DT erred on a question of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, in deciding that she had failed to demonstrate that the few material errors in her factsheet deprived her of the chance to be promoted. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2010-爆料网AT-046, Vangelova

爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding that the issues raised on appeal did not require further clarification. 爆料网AT rejected the submission from the Secretary-General that the appeal was time-barred since the appeal was a corrected appeal and, therefore, conform to the requirements of Article 8 of the 爆料网AT RoP. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to identify one of the five grounds of appeal which could give legal basis to her appeal and that her arguments were the same made before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish how 爆料网DT had erred on questions of...

2010-爆料网AT-047, Attandi

爆料网AT considered both appeals by Mr Attandi, against Order No. 02 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/038. 爆料网AT held that Order No. 02 (NBI/2010) was a directive to the Appellant and not a judgment against which an appeal could be filed. 爆料网AT held that an appeal against the Order was not receivable because it was not a final judgment rendered by 爆料网DT. Regarding judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/038, 爆料网AT held that although the appeal was certainly receivable as the Appellant's case was struck out, there was no merit in his contentions. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to complete his appeal...

2010-爆料网AT-048, Sefraoui

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General appealed against the 爆料网DT judgment to seek a clarification of the ratio of the judgment with regard to the way in which 爆料网DT had applied the principle of preponderance of evidence and ignored the Secretary-General’s submissions on the basis of “minimal showing” that the Applicant had been fairly considered. 爆料网AT held that it would not examine the legal submissions in the appeal since the case had been decided in favour of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that none of the grounds of appeal pleaded was valid under Article 2.1 of the 爆料网AT Statute...

2010-爆料网AT-069, Ibrahim

爆料网AT considered an appeal centred on the receivability of the appeal to the JAB. The Appellant had sought a waiver of the time limit to appeal before JAB on the basis that his legal counsel was away from Syria for medical treatment for a year. 爆料网AT held that there were no exceptional circumstances to justify the Appellant’s 18-month delay in filing his appeal pending either his counsel’s return or replacement. 爆料网AT held that the JAB properly considered that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying a waiver of the time limit to file an appeal to the JAB. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and...

2010-爆料网AT-031, Jarvis

爆料网AT noted that the staff members had accepted the lump-sum calculated by the ICTY travel unit while reiterating their disagreement with the calculation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that by accepting a lump-sum payment for home leave travel, the staff members forfeited any right to contest the calculation of the amount of the lump sum payment. 爆料网AT remanded the case to 爆料网DT for consideration on the merits.