爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered both appeals by Mr Attandi, against Order No. 02 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/038. 爆料网AT held that Order No. 02 (NBI/2010) was a directive to the Appellant and not a judgment against which an appeal could be filed. 爆料网AT held that an appeal against the Order was not receivable because it was not a final judgment rendered by 爆料网DT. Regarding judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/038, 爆料网AT held that although the appeal was certainly receivable as the Appellant's case was struck out, there was no merit in his contentions. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to complete his appeal, demonstrating that the 爆料网DT judgment had one or more of the five defects mentioned in Article 2. 1(a) to (e) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT judgment did not suffer from any jurisdictional or legal defects based on any of the grounds urged by the Appellant. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT order and judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his fixed-term appointment and sought suspension of action. When the matter came up before 爆料网DT on 5 January 2010, after being transferred from the Joint Appeals Board (JAB), the Applicant was invited to complete his statement of appeal, but he failed to do so. 爆料网DT issued Order No. 02 (NBI/2010) granting the Applicant time to complete his appeal by 15 February 2010, with the rider that failure would entail his case getting struck out. In judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/038 爆料网DT struck out the application and noted that the Applicant had not provided any reasonable explanation as to why he did not comply with the 爆料网DT Order.
Legal Principle(s)
The Appellant must satisfy 爆料网AT that the 爆料网DT judgment has one or more of the five defects mentioned in Article 2. 1(a) to (e) of the 爆料网AT Statute.