爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General appealed against the 爆料网DT judgment to seek a clarification of the ratio of the judgment with regard to the way in which 爆料网DT had applied the principle of preponderance of evidence and ignored the Secretary-General’s submissions on the basis of “minimal showing” that the Applicant had been fairly considered. 爆料网AT held that it would not examine the legal submissions in the appeal since the case had been decided in favour of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that none of the grounds of appeal pleaded was valid under Article 2.1 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to select him for two P-4 positions of Arabic Reviser. 爆料网DT dismissed the application, holding that the preponderance of evidence demonstrated that the Applicant’s candidature was given full and fair consideration.
Legal Principle(s)
A party in whose favour a case has been decided is not permitted to appeal against the judgment on legal or academic grounds.