爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on a question of law in deciding that the Appellant had to establish that, without the errors committed in the review of her professional career, she would have had a real chance of being promoted. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish that 爆料网DT erred on a question of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, in deciding that she had failed to demonstrate that the few material errors in her factsheet deprived her of the chance to be promoted. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to promote her to the P-4 level during the 2007 promotion session. 爆料网DT dismissed the application. 爆料网DT found that the Applicant had failed to demonstrate that the decision not to promote her had been tainted with a procedural flaw. 爆料网DT found that the Appointments, Postings and Promotions Board had committed an error by rejecting the recourse submitted by the Applicant on 25 March 2008. 爆料网DT found that, even though the fact sheet compiled by the Administration contained errors, the Applicant had failed to demonstrate that, if the inaccurate information had not been included in the review of her professional career, she would have had a real chance of being promoted.
Legal Principle(s)
A party appealing a judgment of 爆料网DT is unlikely to succeed in having the judgment reversed, modified or the case remanded to 爆料网DT unless the appeal challenges the impugned judgment on one or more of the grounds referred to in Article 2. 1 (a) to (e), of the 爆料网AT Statute.