爆料网

Jurisdiction / receivability (爆料网AT)

  • Appeal
  • Interlocutory appeal
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • 爆料网JSPB
    • Showing 81 - 90 of 209
    2011-爆料网AT-101, Mezoui

    爆料网AT had before it: an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-043 on the issue of to which 爆料网DT Registry 爆料网AT remanded Ms Mezoui’s case; two appeals from 爆料网DT Order Nos. 71 (GVA/2010) and 73 (GVA/2010); and a motion for joinder and fast-track hearing. 爆料网AT held that the application for interpretation was a ruse to have 爆料网AT interfere with 爆料网DT’s assignment of venue. 爆料网AT held that venue was a matter for the trial court’s discretion, with which it would not interfere. 爆料网AT held that it would not, generally, entertain interlocutory appeals. 爆料网AT denied the application for...

    2011-爆料网AT-144, Thiam

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the time limit for filing an appeal may be suspended, waived, or extended, only in exceptional cases and upon a written request by an appellant prior to the filing of an appeal, which the Appellant failed to submit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2011-爆料网AT-113, Kamanou

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in deciding to review the non-attribution issue separately from the other issues. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was receivable because 爆料网DT had committed an error in procedure such as to affect the decision of the case. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal, annulled the judgment and remanded the case to 爆料网DT for a de novo review.

    2011-爆料网AT-106, Piskolti

    爆料网AT considered Mr Paskolti’s application for revision of former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 1459. 爆料网AT held that Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 24 of the 爆料网AT Rules of Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on 爆料网AT to review a judgment of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision on the grounds of non-receivability.

    2011-爆料网AT-104, Sanwidi

    爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/061 on compensation. 爆料网AT held that, as it had previously overturned the judgment on the merits (which found in favour of Mr Sanwidi), the foundation for an award of compensation no longer existed and the appeal was moot. 爆料网AT held that the judgment on compensation was automatically vacated when it overturned the judgment on the merits. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-252, Khambatta

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that appeals against decisions taken during proceedings are receivable only in exceptional circumstances where 爆料网DT has manifestly exceeded its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that even though 爆料网DT may have committed a procedural error, it had not exceeded its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2012-爆料网AT-269, Hamad

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in applying Former 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 106. 1. 16 to calculate the interest applicable to the Appellant’s pay-out and that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in this regard. 爆料网AT held that the contention that the Administrative Rules of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund apply to the Appellant’s situation had no merit and had been raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in finding that the Appellant’s terms and conditions of employment are governed solely and exclusively by the Agency...

    2012-爆料网AT-268, Bangoura

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both Mr Bangoura and the Secretary-General. Mr Bangoura requested oral hearings was rejected. 爆料网AT held that the case would be decided on law and that the pertinent documents were on record. Regarding the Secretary-General’s appeal, 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had requested the execution of a part of judgment No. 1029 of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal and that Tribunal had established a procedure for staff members wishing to challenge the non-execution of a judgment. 爆料网AT held that the staff member needed to make a request for review of the administrative...