2011-��AT-166

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that it was not competent to revise the judgments of the former �� Administration Tribunal. ��AT held that the appeal was not receivable and dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant sought revision of a judgment of the former �� Administrative Tribunal. ��DT ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to do so and held that the application was not receivable.

Legal Principle(s)

��AT is not competent to revise the judgments of the former �� Administrative Tribunal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Gakehmi

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement