2011-��AT-106

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered Mr Paskolti��s application for revision of former �� Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 1459. ��AT held that Article 11 of the ��AT Statute and Article 24 of the ��AT Rules of Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on ��AT to review a judgment of the former �� Administrative Tribunal. ��AT dismissed the application for revision on the grounds of non-receivability.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Former �� Administrative Tribunal judgment: The Applicant contested his non-selection for a position before the former �� Administrative Tribunal, which dismissed his application in judgment No. 1459, Piskolti (2009).

Legal Principle(s)

��AT has no jurisdiction to hear an application for revision of a judgment of the former �� Administrative Tribunal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Piskolti

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement