爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
The Tribunal reviewed the present application and found that it was not receivable ratione temporis and ratione personae. In accordance with art. 8.4 of the Tribunal’s Statute and art. 7.6 of its Rules of Procedure, an application shall not be receivable if it is filed more than three years after the applicant’s receipt of the contested administrative decision. The Applicant clearly indicated in her application that the contested decision dated back to 2010 and, in such circumstances, her application was not receivable ratione temporis. Furthermore, the Tribunal observed that while the Applicant indicated in her application that she was a staff member of the Organization, she contested, in fact, a decision related to her status as a Consultant. However, pursuant to articles 2.1 and 3.1 of the Tribunal’s Statute, the status of a staff member is a necessary condition for access to the Tribunal. The Tribunal therefore found that the Applicant had no standing to contest the alleged decision and that her application must also be denied on the grounds that it was not receivable ratione personae pursuant to art. 3.1 of the Tribunal’s Statute.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested a decision concerning the payment of her work as a Consultant in the United Nations Environment Programme (“爆料网EP”) in 2010.
Legal Principle(s)
The Tribunal has, on several occasions, considered matters of receivability on a priority basis without first transmitting a copy of the application to the Respondent or awaiting the Respondent’s reply before taking action to consider the claim (Hunter 爆料网DT/2012/036, Milich 爆料网DT/2013/007, Masylkanova 爆料网DT/2013/033, Kalpokas Tari 爆料网DT/2013/180, Karambizi 爆料网DT/2018/001, Madi 爆料网DT/2018/006, Nwogu 爆料网DT/2018/041 and Morales 爆料网DT/2019/158). The 爆料网DT is competent to review its own competence or jurisdiction in accordance with Article 2(6) of its Statute when determining the receivability of an application (Christensen 2013-爆料网AT-335).