2013-惇蹋厙AT-335

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT held that the Appellant failed to establish any errors warranting the reversal of the 惇蹋厙DT judgment concerning her entitlements. 惇蹋厙AT held that the 惇蹋厙DT correctly concluded that the claim was not receivable. 惇蹋厙AT recalled that 惇蹋厙DT has no jurisdiction to waive the deadlines for management evaluation or administrative review. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

ICAO Decision: The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her certain entitlements. 惇蹋厙DT found that the application was not receivable as the Applicant had failed to request administrative review. 惇蹋厙DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

惇蹋厙DT has no jurisdiction to waive the deadlines for management evaluation or administrative review. 惇蹋厙DT is competent to review its own competence or jurisdiction, which can be exercised even if the parties or the administrative authorities do not raise the issue, because it constitutes a matter of law.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Christensen

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement