±¬ÁÏÍø

The Tribunal is not seized of an intelligible application. The applicant has failed to identify the impugned administrative decision or decisions for which he is seeking relief. He has also failed to identify any steps taken by him to seek administrative review of the impugned administrative decisions. The Tribunal therefore has no jurisdiction pursuant to Article 2 (1) (a) and Article 8(1) of the Statute of the ±¬ÁÏÍøDT or the equivalent provisions of the Statute of the former ±¬ÁÏÍø Administrative Tribunal to consider the application. Second, the applicant has failed to comply with two orders of the Tribunal. The first response was both informal and inadequate, the second, non existent. In spite of being afforded the opportunity, the applicant has failed to provide the Tribunal with material from which it can adjudicate his case. On the face of the documents filed, it is not receivable pursuant to Article 2 of the ±¬ÁÏÍøDT Statute. In addition, the repeated failure to comply with the orders of the Tribunal disqualifies the applicant from prosecuting his application. The Tribunal ordered that the matter be struck out.