��DT/2010/100

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

Since he remained a WFP staff member and pursuant to the above-mentioned Inter-Organization Agreement, the applicant never had a contractual relationship with ��AMID. Only WFP was in a position to render decisions that could affect his terms of appointment. Two decisions were at stake. With respect to the first (WFP decision not to treat him as a D-1), his case could not be heard before ��DT because WFP has recognised ILOAT as judicial review body. Concerning the second (��AMID decision not to appoint him as Deputy Director), the applicant is not a ��staff member�� within the meaning of art. 3 ��DT Statute. This provision gives access to ��DT only to staff members of those entities of the �� common system that have recognized ��DT as judicial review body. With respect to the ��AMID selection procedure, the applicant had to be considered as an external candidate. Outcome: The application was rejected.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The applicant, a P-5 staff member of WFP, was loaned under a reimbursable loan agreement to ��AMID, where he worked as a Principal Officer on a post he considered to be at the D-1 level. Later on, he was also selected by ��AMID for a Deputy Director post at the D-1 level, but he never received a letter of appointment from ��AMID. Having unsuccessfully tried to clarify his contractual situation, he requested a management evaluation, which upheld the decision not to appoint him as Deputy Director at the D-1 level.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Iskandar

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement