±¬ÁÏÍø

Since he remained a WFP staff member and pursuant to the above-mentioned Inter-Organization Agreement, the applicant never had a contractual relationship with ±¬ÁÏÍøAMID. Only WFP was in a position to render decisions that could affect his terms of appointment. Two decisions were at stake. With respect to the first (WFP decision not to treat him as a D-1), his case could not be heard before ±¬ÁÏÍøDT because WFP has recognised ILOAT as judicial review body. Concerning the second (±¬ÁÏÍøAMID decision not to appoint him as Deputy Director), the applicant is not a ¡°staff member¡± within the meaning of art. 3...

It is clear from the reimbursable loan agreement that ±¬ÁÏÍøAMID and WFP agreed on the Applicant¡¯s loan at the P-5 level. He thus had no reason to believe that he would be paid at the D-1 level or that he would be promoted to that level by ±¬ÁÏÍøAMID. Although the Applicant was informed of his selection for the Deputy Director post, he never received a letter of appointment from ±¬ÁÏÍøAMID which could have created contractual rights in his favour. The Applicant failed to demonstrate that ±¬ÁÏÍøAMID made any promise to him or committed any fault for which it could be held responsible.