2021-惇蹋厙AT-1103

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT agreed with 惇蹋厙DT that the present case does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the identification of candidates was available to the assessors. 惇蹋厙AT held that Mr Krioutchkov has failed to rebut the 惇蹋厙DT finding regarding the legality of the CRB process. 惇蹋厙AT held that 惇蹋厙DT properly reviewed the contested decision in accordance with the applicable law, and its judgment is consistent with the 惇蹋厙AT jurisprudence. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The decision to not select Mr Krioutchkov for the P-4 position of Russian Reviser with 惇蹋厙OG.

Legal Principle(s)

In reviewing administrative decisions regarding appointments and promotions, the factors to be considered are: (a) Whether the procedure as laid down in the Staff Regulations and Rules were followed; (b) Whether the staff member was given fair and adequate consideration; and (c) Whether the applicable regulations and rules were applied in a fair, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. The Tribunal's role is not to substitute its decision for that of the Administration. The burden of proof rests with the person making the allegation of improper motives, such as bias. It is not for 惇蹋厙DT to substitute or help a party to provide sufficient evidence of his claims, in light of the principle of party disposition (as opposed to the principle of the inquisition), according to which, in principle, the parties delimit the subject matter of the dispute and should provide evidence of their allegations.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

Appeal dismissed and Judgment No. 惇蹋厙DT/2020/040 affirmed.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Vladislav Krioutchkov

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement