爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an application for interpretation and another for execution of judgment filed by the staff member. Regarding the application for interpretation of judgment, 爆料网AT held that the judgment was clear in its meaning and written in plain and unambiguous language, which left no reasonable doubt as to what it meant, requiring no interpretation. Regarding the application for execution of judgment, 爆料网AT held that there was no need to order execution, namely the Appellant’s reinstatement, since the judgment had already been fully executed by means of compensation, rather than rescission and reinstatement. 爆料网AT dismissed the applications for interpretation and execution of judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网AT granted the staff member’s appeal, rescinded 爆料网RWA’s decision to separate him from service for abandonment of post, and ordered his reinstatement or compensation in lieu.
Legal Principle(s)
Interpretation is only needed to clarify the meaning of a judgment when the judgment leaves reasonable doubts about the will of the Tribunal or the arguments leading to a decision.