爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT upheld the findings of 爆料网RWA DT that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the Appellant’s post was arbitrary or capricious, motivated by prejudice or extraneous factors, or was flawed by procedural irregularity or error of law. 爆料网AT held that there was evidence of a process that was motivated by budgetary constraints as well as concerns about the effective management of a redundancy process. 爆料网AT found no procedural irregularity or any error in law on the part of 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision to abolish her post and declare her provisionally redundant. 爆料网RWA DT concluded that there was a genuine redundancy situation. 爆料网RWA DT was of the view that evaluating staff members on previous and current performance was reasonable under the special circumstances of the case and rejected the Applicant’s contention that her evaluation was unfair. 爆料网RWA DT dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank