爆料网

爆料网RWA Personnel Directives

  • Area Staff Personnel Directive No. A/4/Part II, Rev. 8/Section I
  • IPD 1/10
  • IPD/I/104.4
  • IPD/I/112.6/Rev.1
  • PD 1/4/Part I/Rev.1
  • PD A/10
  • PD A/10/Rev.1
  • PD A/10/Rev.3
  • PD A/17
  • PD A/2/Part.II/Rev. 4
  • PD A/23
  • PD A/3
  • PD A/4/Part II/Rev.7
  • PD A/4/Part VII/Rev.7
  • PD A/5/Part II
  • PD A/5/Rev.7/Part II
  • PD A/6/Amend.12/Part III
  • PD A/6/Amend.72
  • PD A/6/Part II/Amend.2
  • PD A/6/Part VI
  • PD A/60
  • PD A/9
  • PD A/9/Rev.10
  • PD I/104.2
  • PD No.A/3/Rev.1/Part XI/Amend.5
  • PD/A/1/Rev.1/Par1/Section 1
  • PD/A/4/Part II/ Rev.7/Section 1
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 53
    2025-爆料网AT-1594, Ismail Mahmoud Awadat

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s misconduct was established and that the disciplinary measure of separation from service, with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity, was proportionate under the Agency’s regulatory framework. The 爆料网AT emphasized that fraud and collusive practices are considered areas of high concern and that misconduct committed by a person in a position of trust, such as a member of the Provident Fund Loans Committee, warrants a severe sanction.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网RWA...

    2025-爆料网AT-1572, Nader Slayyeh

    The 爆料网AT found that Mr. Slayyeh did not file a proper appeal of the impugned Judgment but rather was bringing a new claim for compensation that had not been submitted to the Dispute Tribunal. The 爆料网AT held that he could not introduce on appeal an issue not previously presented to the first instance tribunal as it is a violation of the due process rights of the other party and does not comply with the two-tier system of administration of justice.

    The 爆料网AT found that the remedies available under Article 10(5) of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute allow the 爆料网RWA DT to rescind the contested decision or order...

    2025-爆料网AT-1521, Mahmoud Mohamad Zeidan

    The 爆料网AT noted that the vacancy had been advertised for only ten days which violated the mandatory requirement of the 爆料网RWA Personnel Directive, and this violation had been corrected by cancelling the recruitment process and constituting another one that met the requirement of the minimum posting period.

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member had not identified the alleged defects of the impugned Judgment but rather had reargued his case and, therefore, had not discharged his burden of satisfying the Appeals Tribunal that the impugned Judgment had been in error.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that, in...

    2025-爆料网AT-1514, Nadim El Haj

    The 爆料网AT held that even though the Commissioner-General had mistakenly reimbursed the fine to Mr. El-Haj after the issuance of the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment, since the fine was subsequently reimposed, the appeal was not moot.

    The 爆料网AT held that in order to find that a staff member’s conduct was “serious misconduct” so as to warrant a more serious sanction, the Commissioner-General had to provide reasons for this determination. In this case, the Commissioner-General provided no reasons, and the 爆料网AT rejected the Commissioner-General’s argument that reasons were not necessary because it was manifestly...

    2024-爆料网AT-1510, Mohamed Elmenshawy

    The 爆料网AT held that although the former staff member did not receive the full investigation report until after the disciplinary process was concluded, there was no due process violation because the opportunity to respond letter was detailed, and he received the full investigation report early in the Dispute Tribunal proceedings.

    The 爆料网AT held that the Dispute Tribunal had appropriately heard live testimony from numerous witnesses, all of whom were subject to cross-examination, and had admitted certain hearsay statements using established methods of corroboration. The 爆料网AT held that the Dispute...

    2024-爆料网AT-1482, Maha Mohammad Issawi

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member had no legitimate expectation of renewal of her fixed-term appointment, as there was no evidence that the Administration had made any express promise that would have created such an expectation. On the contrary, the 爆料网AT found that the Administration had properly informed all affected staff, including the former staff member, of the last date of the MADAD Project and advertised 15 clerical posts internally, inviting staff to apply for alternative positions. The 爆料网AT further held that these actions should be viewed in light of the continuous efforts...

    2024-爆料网AT-1507, Mahmoud Ahmad Ali

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT rightly identified that the standard of proof for placing the staff member on ALWOP was whether there was reasonable suspicion or reasonable grounds to believe that the staff member had committed the alleged misconduct.

    The 爆料网AT rejected the staff member’s argument that his ex-wife’s withdrawal of the complaint against him in a national court should have stopped all investigations against him. The 爆料网AT noted that the national court had provided the case records to the Agency, and the Agency, following its complete assessment of the situation, can proceed with...

    2024-爆料网AT-1506, Amjad Al-Thaher

    The 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s determination of the former staff member’s chances of selection for the position at one-fourth on alternative grounds. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT appropriately considered the possibility that the Agency could have introduced additional candidates on an equivalency basis during a second review after the shortlisting phase. In particular, the 爆料网RWA DT held that, since the sufficient number of candidates for a competitive exercise was normally between three to five candidates per vacancy, it was reasonable to expect that the Agency would have brought more...

    2024-爆料网AT-1489, Ahmad Hasan Hamad

    The 爆料网AT noted that before the applicant became a staff member, he had been employed by 爆料网RWA as complementary personnel with non-staff status and was not entitled to any benefit beyond what had been established for daily-paid workers. The 爆料网AT observed that neither his daily-paid service contracts nor a sample of daily-paid service contracts applicable at the relevant time mentioned payment of any compensation upon expiration.

    The 爆料网AT found that upon each expiry of the applicant’s daily-paid service contract, it was successively renewed and he was bound by the Agency’s regulations and...

    2024-爆料网AT-1496, Mahmoud Mohamad Zeidan

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT had erred in law when it found that the applicable legal framework allowed the interview panel to conduct technical assessments of the candidates. However, the 爆料网AT held that the procedural irregularity of the panel having held a second round of interviews of a purely technical nature, would not suffice to grant the appeal because the outcome of the recruitment process would have been the same.

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT had not erred with regards to the Agency’s failure to correctly apply gender parity rules. The 爆料网AT found that gender parity had not...