2017-爆料网AT-749, Ayoub
爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT upheld the findings of 爆料网RWA DT that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the Appellant’s post was arbitrary or capricious, motivated by prejudice or extraneous factors, or was flawed by procedural irregularity or error of law. 爆料网AT held that there was evidence of a process that was motivated by budgetary constraints as well as concerns about the effective management of a redundancy process. 爆料网AT found no procedural irregularity or any error in law on the part of 爆料网RWA DT...