爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that while only final judgments of the 爆料网DT are appealable, exceptions may be made when 爆料网DT has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence regarding interlocutory orders. 爆料网AT held that an order denying an application for suspension of action does not constitute 爆料网DT exceeding its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT further noted that 爆料网DT correctly found that it had no jurisdiction to grant the application under Article 10(2) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable ratione materiae.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision of the Department for General Assembly and Conference Management to separate him upon the expiration of his fixed-term appointment and to not renew his appointment. He also filed an application for suspension of action and interim measures pending judicial review of the contested decision. 爆料网DT denied the Applicant’s requests.
Legal Principle(s)
Generally speaking, only final judgments of the 爆料网DT are appealable but exceptions may be made when 爆料网DT has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence regarding interlocutory orders. An order denying an application for suspension of action cannot be considered to be a case in which the 爆料网DT clearly exceeded its jurisdiction.