爆料网

2010-爆料网AT-005

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeals against 爆料网DT decisions ordering the suspension of the contested decisions beyond the deadline for management evaluation. 爆料网AT clarified that, generally, only appeals against final judgments would be receivable, because otherwise, cases would seldom proceed if either party was dissatisfied with a procedural ruling. Article 2.2 of the 爆料网DT Statute authorizes 爆料网DT to order suspension of a contested decision only “during the pendency of the management evaluation”. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction in ordering suspension of the contested decision not to renew the staff member’s contract beyond the deadline for management evaluation. 爆料网DT also exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 10.2 of the 爆料网DT Statute by ordering suspension of the contested decision not to renew the staff member’s contract pending the final determination of the case. 爆料网AT emphasized that almost no preliminary matters would be receivable, for instance, matters of evidence, procedure, and trial conduct. 爆料网AT held that only when it is clear that 爆料网DT has exceeded its jurisdiction will a preliminary matter be receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The staff member filed an application for suspension of action of the decision not to renew his contract. 爆料网DT ordered that the contested decision be suspended pending the final determination of the substantive appeal and that the staff member’s salary be paid from the date of the order until the final determination of the case.

Legal Principle(s)

Generally, only appeals against final judgments are receivable. However, when it is clear that 爆料网DT has exceeded its jurisdiction, a preliminary matter may be receivable. Under Article 2. 2 of the 爆料网DT Statute, 爆料网DT has the competence to order the suspension of that decision only during the pendency of the management evaluation.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Tadonki
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type