爆料网

Judgment-related matters

  • Appeals of final judgments
  • Correction of judgment
  • Correction of Judgment
  • Execution of Judgment
  • Execution of judgment
  • Execution of judgment
  • Interpretation of Judgment
  • Revision of Judgment
  • Revision of judgment
  • Revision of judgment
    • Showing 51 - 60 of 187
    2010-爆料网AT-050/Corr.1, Nasr Ishak

    In Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-050, 爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable since it was not filed within 45 calendar days of receipt of the 爆料网DT Judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction to receive the Appellant’s appeal before the JAB. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment. In Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-050/Corr.1, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was granted an extension of time to file an appeal to 16 February 2010 and he filed his appeal on that date. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s submission that the appeal was...

    2010-爆料网AT-066, El Khatib

    爆料网AT considered an application for “reconsideration” of Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-029bis. 爆料网AT noted that its judgments are final and not subject to appeal except under Article 11 of its Statute, relating to the procedures for revision and correction of material errors and that no appeal against res judicata is admissible. 爆料网AT held that the application was an appeal against res judicata and, as such, was inadmissible. Noting that Ms. El-Khatib’s appeal was dismissed as non-receivable and without merit, 爆料网AT held that the application for “reconsideration” constituted an abuse of the appeals...

    2010-爆料网AT-064, Kasmani

    爆料网AT stated that an Application for Interpretation is not receivable if its actual purpose is to have 爆料网AT re-examine its decision, even though its judgments are final and without appeal, or to have it comment on its decision. 爆料网AT held that the applications made under subparagraphs (a) to (g) of paragraph 30 of the appeal, with the purpose of either calling into question the decision or having 爆料网AT issue comments on the decision, were not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the use of the word “annul” would not lead to confusion in the mind of a party in good faith because the language of...

    2010-爆料网AT-063, Costa

    爆料网AT referenced the Shanks jurisprudence (judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-026bis) where it held that the authority of a final judgment - res judicata - cannot be so readily set aside. 爆料网AT noted that there are only limited grounds as enumerated in Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute for review of a final judgment and an allegation of an error in law is not one of them. 爆料网AT dismissed the application to set aside and remand the previous judgment.

    2011-爆料网AT-126, Lesar

    爆料网AT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 1465 of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal submitted by Mr Lesar. 爆料网AT noted that General Assembly resolution 63/253 was silent on the question of revision of judgments handed down by the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal during the period prior to its abolishment. 爆料网AT held that the omission did not constitute a denial of the right to an effective remedy since a tribunal had already dispensed justice. 爆料网AT held that it was not competent to revise the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal Judgment and that therefore, the application...

    2011-爆料网AT-101, Mezoui

    爆料网AT had before it: an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-043 on the issue of to which 爆料网DT Registry 爆料网AT remanded Ms Mezoui’s case; two appeals from 爆料网DT Order Nos. 71 (GVA/2010) and 73 (GVA/2010); and a motion for joinder and fast-track hearing. 爆料网AT held that the application for interpretation was a ruse to have 爆料网AT interfere with 爆料网DT’s assignment of venue. 爆料网AT held that venue was a matter for the trial court’s discretion, with which it would not interfere. 爆料网AT held that it would not, generally, entertain interlocutory appeals. 爆料网AT denied the application for...