爆料网

2010-爆料网AT-066

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an application for “reconsideration” of Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-029bis. 爆料网AT noted that its judgments are final and not subject to appeal except under Article 11 of its Statute, relating to the procedures for revision and correction of material errors and that no appeal against res judicata is admissible. 爆料网AT held that the application was an appeal against res judicata and, as such, was inadmissible. Noting that Ms. El-Khatib’s appeal was dismissed as non-receivable and without merit, 爆料网AT held that the application for “reconsideration” constituted an abuse of the appeals procedure. 爆料网AT rejected the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous 爆料网AT Judgment: Ms El-Khatib contested the decision to withdraw an offer of appointment. In Judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-029bis, 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

Judgments of 爆料网AT are final and not subject to appeal, with limited exceptions. No appeal against res judicata is admissible.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
El Khatib
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type