爆料网

爆料网AMI

Showing 21 - 30 of 66
2011-爆料网AT-138, Abdalla

爆料网AT held that, in order for the Appellant’s claim of legitimate expectation of renewal of appointment to be sustained, it must not be based on mere verbal assertions, but on a firm commitment to renewal revealed by the circumstances of the case; and 爆料网AT held that it found no reason to reverse the finding of 爆料网DT that there was no evidence of such a commitment. 爆料网AT held that the efficient or outstanding performance of a staff member on a temporary appointment could not legitimately create an expectancy of renewal of appointment. 爆料网AT held that the need for translator services at 爆料网AMI could...

2011-爆料网AT-115, Islam

爆料网AT noted that the reason given for the non-renewal of the Appellant’s contract was a restructuring and that the Appellant conceded that the restructuring was properly done. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the opinion expressed by the Appellant’s Chief, that his performance deficiencies and shortcomings could justify the non-renewal of his contract, was immaterial. 爆料网AT held that the Administration provided the Appellant with legitimate reasons for the non-renewal of his appointment. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2012-爆料网AT-264, Seddik Ben Omar

爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding that the factual and legal issues had already been clearly defined by the parties. 爆料网AT noted that there was no record of the Appellant ever having sought or been granted leave to submit further submissions or evidence prior to the 爆料网DT decision under appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant, consequently, failed to establish that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Appellant had not produced sufficient evidence of distress linked specifically to the placement of the Note to warrant compensation for emotional distress. 爆料网AT held that the evidence...

2013-爆料网AT-301, Osman

爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s submissions were largely a reiteration of his arguments before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that there was no indication that the non-renewal decision or other incidents amounted to harassment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err when it concluded that the behaviours at stake, even when viewed together, did not point to any kind of prohibited conduct in the sense of ST/SGB/2008/5. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s findings that the advice given to the Appellant regarding uncertified sick leave was correct. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s allegation that...

2015-爆料网AT-507, Porter

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT recalled the importance of its jurisprudence on the receivability of appeals against interlocutory orders in that the excess of jurisdiction or competence must be clear or manifest. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that such a threshold had been met by the Secretary-General, given the circumstances of the case. 爆料网AT held that adjudication of the matters complained of by the Secretary-General, notwithstanding that they touched upon the competence of 爆料网DT, was more proper for consideration once a final judgment has been rendered by 爆料网DT...

2016-爆料网AT-678, Khalaf

爆料网AT preliminarily denied the request for an oral argument and then considered the merits of the appeal. 爆料网AT found that the requirements of Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute were not fulfilled in the Appellant’s case as 爆料网DT did not commit an error of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT noted that the evidence showed that the Administration was involved in a process of revision of activities in Iraq, rationalizing of staff, realignment of functions, and reduction of budget. These administrative activities led to the redeployment of the post encumbered by the Appellant...

2016-爆料网AT-677, Chalabi

爆料网AT preliminarily denied the request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT considered the appeal, specifically whether the Appellant had a legitimate expectation for the renewal of his fixed-term contract and rights related to the renewal of his fixed-term contract. 爆料网AT noted that in the absence of any evidence of a firm commitment of renewal, there was no basis to support the Appellant’s claim of legitimate expectation and/or right for the renewal of his contract. 爆料网AT further held that it was clear from the evidence that the Administration was involved in the process of revising the activities in Iraq...

2016-爆料网AT-667, Awe

爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s motion for additional pleadings because he did not demonstrate the existence of exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT also found no fault with 爆料网DT’s holding that the decision to relocate the Appellant was lawful. 爆料网AT noted that an accepted method for determining whether the reassignment of a staff member to another position was proper is to assess whether the new post was at the staff member’s grade; whether the responsibilities involved corresponded to his or her level; whether the functions to be performed were commensurate with the staff member’s competence and...

2016-爆料网AT-666, Han

爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s submission that 爆料网DT’s failure to determine his motion to order the Secretary-General to produce relevant documents amounted to an error in procedure such as to affect the decision in the case. Article 19 of the 爆料网DT Rules of Procedure gives 爆料网DT broad discretion in managing its cases and in determining whether or not it has sufficient evidence and information “for the fair and expeditious disposal of the case and to do justice to the parties. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant adduced no evidence to support his contention that the exercise of discretion by 爆料网DT was...

2017-爆料网AT-796, Porter

爆料网AT considered the appeal of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the paragraphs of the 爆料网DT judgment in question were in a plain, unambiguous language that left no reasonable doubt as to their meaning and that they required no interpretation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in holding that the application for interpretation was receivable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should have dealt with the claim for interest in its judgment, but it omitted to do so. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence by wrongly applying Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute to alter the substance of its final ruling by...