2011-��AT-115

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT noted that the reason given for the non-renewal of the Appellant��s contract was a restructuring and that the Appellant conceded that the restructuring was properly done. ��AT agreed with ��DT that the opinion expressed by the Appellant��s Chief, that his performance deficiencies and shortcomings could justify the non-renewal of his contract, was immaterial. ��AT held that the Administration provided the Appellant with legitimate reasons for the non-renewal of his appointment. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his contract. ��DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

When a justification is given by the Administration for the exercise of its discretion, it must be supported by the facts.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Islam

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement