爆料网

Discrimination and other improper motives

  • Age
  • Bias/favouritism
  • Gender
  • Nationality
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Sexual orientation
    • Showing 31 - 40 of 140
    2010-爆料网AT-096, Antaki

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member. 爆料网AT held that the evidence supported the conclusion that the decision not to appoint the Appellant was overall lawful and did not violate her rights. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was not deprived of any significant chance of being promoted because there were other candidates ranked higher than her. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate any errors in the 爆料网DT judgment regarding the merits of the administrative decision that would warrant 爆料网AT’s intervention. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that she was not properly...

    2010-爆料网AT-081, Azzouni

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in failing to consider adequately the Appellant’s evidence, noting she was not given the opportunity to prove her case, including allegations of discrimination, at the 爆料网DT hearing, which included the opportunity to call evidence and to challenge the Administration’s evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in allowing testimony to be given at the hearing that was neither sworn, affirmed, nor made under a promise, to tell the truth. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal, set aside the 爆料网DT judgment and ordered reinstatement or the award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement in...

    2011-爆料网AT-179, Ibekwe

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant was unable to establish that her non-selection to the two posts was flawed, or that she was not given full and fair consideration during the selection process. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s claim was that she faced general discrimination for many years, but that she pleaded this without demonstrating specific discrimination when she was denied the appointment. 爆料网AT held that there is always a presumption that official acts have been regularly performed. 爆料网AT held that proof of unsubstantiated allegations of general discrimination, in the form of two letters...

    2011-爆料网AT-177, Tabari

    On the issue of receivability, 爆料网AT noted that not taking a decision was also a decision. 爆料网AT noted that the alleged discrimination was based on a comparison between the claimant and staff members of a different category, namely international staff members. 爆料网AT held that the general principle of equal pay for equal work does not prevent a legislative body or the Administration from establishing different treatments for different categories of workers or staff members if the distinction is made on the basis of lawful goals. 爆料网AT held that there was no discrimination when the non-payment of...

    2011-爆料网AT-124, Appellant

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to show how 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction or competence or failed to exercise its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not identified an error on a question of law. 爆料网AT held that it had no reason to disagree with 爆料网DT’s holding that no institutional prejudice, or retaliation, played a part in the non-renewal of the Appellant’s contract. 爆料网AT noted that the decision to take the Appellant’s portfolio away from him had been taken before he had made any report of wrongdoing. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s non-selection for the 11 posts involved...

    2011-爆料网AT-112, Abbasi

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that no gender discrimination took place against Ms Abbasi. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that there was gender discrimination against her. 爆料网AT held that the Administration applied 爆料网ICEF’s Gender Parity and Equality Policy in Ms Abbasi’s favour. 爆料网AT did not find any violation of the right to be equally considered – or even favoured for reasons of gender – in the evaluation criteria applied or in the decisions taken by 爆料网ICEF during the selection process. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2011-爆料网AT-107, Chen

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Ms Chen. 爆料网AT held that the principle that everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work (Article 23(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) applies to 爆料网 staff. 爆料网AT held that budgetary considerations could not trump the requirement of equal treatment. 爆料网AT declined to grant the relief sought by Ms Chen in her cross-appeal on the basis that 爆料网DT awarded damages from the correct date. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s allegation that 爆料网DT usurped the Secretary-General’s...

    2012-爆料网AT-272, Abubakr

    爆料网AT considered the appeals by the Secretary-General and by Mr Abubakr. Regarding the Secretary-General’s appeal, 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the Administration had failed to address Mr Abubakr’s complaint of harassment and discrimination with the required due diligence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in law and fact in choosing not to recognize, in any way meaningful, the majority of the actions relied on by the Secretary-General to address Mr Abubakr’s complaints. 爆料网AT held that, by virtue of the “dysfunctional” work of the Panel on Discrimination and Other Grievances (PDOG), Mr Abubakr...

    2012-爆料网AT-251, Xu

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that “consideration” of a candidate for the purposes of ST/AI/2006/3 did not necessarily mean that a candidate can only be meaningfully considered once the relevant assessment tools have been administered to the candidates and the outcome communicated to them. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the Administration invited the 30-day mark candidates to undertake a written test before the assessment of the 15-day mark candidates was completed did not mean that the Appellant was not afforded priority consideration. 爆料网AT noted that the written test had taken...

    2012-爆料网AT-234, Gehr

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly found that the alignment policy constituted an organisational measure aimed at simplifying administrative procedures in relation to staff appointments at 爆料网ODC. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that, as a result of the Secretary-General’s broad discretion in relation to decisions on internal management, the issuance of the policy by a “Message of the Day” was subject to limited review by the Tribunal. 爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网DT’s finding that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that the application of the alignment policy to his case was motivated by improper motives and...