爆料网

2011-爆料网AT-112

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that no gender discrimination took place against Ms Abbasi. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that there was gender discrimination against her. 爆料网AT held that the Administration applied 爆料网ICEF’s Gender Parity and Equality Policy in Ms Abbasi’s favour. 爆料网AT did not find any violation of the right to be equally considered – or even favoured for reasons of gender – in the evaluation criteria applied or in the decisions taken by 爆料网ICEF during the selection process. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Abbasi contested her non-selection for three positions. 爆料网DT found she suffered from gender discrimination and awarded compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

A decision not to select a staff member may be rescinded in circumstances where he or she did not receive fair and adequate consideration, there has been any kind of discrimination or bias against the staff member, or the proper staff selection procedures were not followed.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Abbasi
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type