±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that no gender discrimination took place against Ms Abbasi. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøDT erred in finding that there was gender discrimination against her. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the Administration applied ±¬ÁÏÍøICEF¡¯s Gender Parity and Equality Policy in Ms Abbasi¡¯s favour. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT did not find any violation of the right to be equally considered ¨C or even favoured for reasons of gender ¨C in the evaluation criteria applied or in the decisions taken by ±¬ÁÏÍøICEF during the selection process. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT upheld the appeal and vacated the ±¬ÁÏÍøDT judgment.

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an application for revision and an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2011-±¬ÁÏÍøAT-112, both filed by Ms Abbasi. On the application for revision, ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that it constituted a disguised way to criticise the impugned judgment or to disagree with it, noting that the rules did not allow the use of an application for revision for such a goal or to modify, complete or improve a ±¬ÁÏÍøAT judgment. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that, even if the ¡°cheating¡± in the written test had been qualified as previously unknown and not due to Ms Abbasi¡¯s negligence, it would not have had a decisive impact on...