爆料网

爆料网RWA DT Statute

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10(4)
  • Article 10(5)(a)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11(4)
  • Article 11(5)
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 3
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.2
    • Showing 61 - 70 of 127
    2015-爆料网AT-548, Khaleel

    爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the rejection of the application as not receivable was correct on the basis that the Appellant did not seek decision review within the mandatory time period, which meant that 爆料网RWA DT was precluded in law from considering the merits of his application. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify how the 爆料网RWA DT judgment was in any way defective or demonstrated that 爆料网RWA DT erred in relation to its jurisdiction or committed an error of fact or law or procedure such as would warrant intervention by 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT...

    2015-爆料网AT-534, Assale

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it applied 爆料网ICEF Administrative Instruction CF/AI/2011-001 retroactively to review the non-renewal decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in concluding that it was the duty of the Administration to take measures to remedy failings in performance. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the non-renewal decision was vitiated by 爆料网ICEF’s failure to take remedial measures to improve Mr Assale’s performance was without legal basis. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erroneously concluded that both the Chad Country...

    2015-爆料网AT-522, Munir

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that there was no reason to reverse the finding of 爆料网DT that a legitimate expectation of a one-year extension was unequivocally created by virtue of the decision taken at the Core Management Group meeting. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT decision that Mr Munir had a legitimate expectation and the decision of the Resident Representative not to seek a one-year renewal of his contract was an unlawful exercise of discretion. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General failed to demonstrate that the compensation was unreasonable because there was a...

    2015-爆料网AT-514, Abu Nada

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the decision to suspend him without pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was alert to the injury which the prolonged delay caused the Appellant. On the Appellant’s complaint that 爆料网RWA DT did not address his complaint regarding the deduction by 爆料网RWA from his personal Provident Fund contributions upon his dismissal, apparently, to recoup an overpayment, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the complaint and the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact on the part of the 爆料网RWA DT when it determined these...

    2015-爆料网AT-504, Hassan

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant raised the same issues he raised before 爆料网RWA DT and did not identify how the judgment was in any way defective. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify any of the required grounds of appeal and failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT committed any error of fact or law in arriving at its decision. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s case was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网RWA DT and found no error of law or fact in its decision. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

    2016-爆料网AT-689, Shehadeh

    爆料网AT considered whether the Appellant filed his appeal within the applicable time limit. 爆料网AT noted that the 60-day time limit to file an appeal expired on 11 April 2016 and the Appellant filed his appeal on 12 April 2016. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and that the Appellant did not request a waiver or extension of the deadline from 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT accordingly did not need to address the Appellant’s motion to submit additional evidence. Moreover, 爆料网AT did not find any fault with 爆料网RWA DT’s holding, as it was clear that the Appellant did not meet the criteria for selection, and it was...

    2016-爆料网AT-664, Al Dawoud

    爆料网AT considered whether 爆料网RWA DT made an error of fact, resulting in an unreasonable decision when it found that the Appellant submitted her request for decision review. 爆料网AT found that the evidence showed that 爆料网RWA DT did not make a factual error when it found that the request for decision review was made on 7 July 2014. 爆料网AT noted that, as the request for decision review was submitted on 7 July 2014, the time for the Appellant to file an application for judicial review expired 120 days thereafter, on 4 November 2014. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s application for judicial review was not...

    2016-爆料网AT-643, Harb

    爆料网AT held that there was merit in the Appellant’s argument that the issue to be decided was not whether he was entitled or not to the SOA, but the refusal of its retroactive payment at the correct rate from the date of the signature of his post description. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it failed to consider that the Appellant was contesting a specific decision denying him a retrospective payment of the higher SOA. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law in deciding that the Appellant had failed to identify an administrative decision capable of being brought within the scope of judicial...

    2016-爆料网AT-638, Maiga

    爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s request for leave to submit new evidence since the Secretary-General had the opportunity to present the evidence before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT further rejected the staff member’s requests in response and to conduct an oral hearing finding that the appealed issues had been adequately clarified. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erroneously substituted itself for the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s findings were supported by evidence and would, therefore, not interfere with the determination as to the existence of...

    2016-爆料网AT-626, Masri

    爆料网AT held that, since the Appellant had not made an application to the 爆料网RWA Internal Justice Committee on the issue of the recusal and conflict of interest, it would not permit the issue to be raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish in his appeal that it was unreasonable for 爆料网RWA DT to conclude that there was no evidence of bias in the decision to abolish his post. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.