2015-爆料网AT-606, Hayek
As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT found that there were no exceptional circumstances to warrant the granting of the Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply to the Commissioner-General’s answer and denied the motion. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA’s findings that the application was not receivable ratione temporis because it was filed more than three years after the receipt of the termination decision and that 爆料网RWA DT had no discretion to waive the regulatory time limit of three years, were unassailable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable ratione...